The ‘Changing Same of Power’
State territoriality and natural gas market liberalization in Thailand
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 8943327 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Alexander Dodge (0000-0002-9919-9069, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2020 |
| Volumen | 112 |
| Páginas | 31-40 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2020-04-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Geoforum (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0016-7185 • E-ISSN: 1872-9398 |
| Editorial | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.03.015 |
| OpenAlex | W3014834092 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 6 |
| Referencias citadas | 36 |
Natural gas markets have been traditionally territorialized within the nation-state apparatus. However, since the early 1980s, the territoriality of these markets has been evolving through liberalization, cross-border market integration, and globalization in the form of liquefied natural gas (LNG) trade. These dynamics have materialized unevenly across the global economy. While natural gas market liberalization has been implemented in the United States and Europe, natural gas markets in most Asian countries continue to be firmly controlled by regulated or state-owned natural gas monopolies. This is the case in Thailand, where despite multiple reform efforts since the 1990's, the partially privatized, state-owned natural gas company, PTT Public Company Limited, continues to hold a lucrative monopoly over markets in Thailand. In this article, I explain why natural gas market liberalization in Thailand has failed to materialize by drawing upon an analytical toolkit that includes both territorial and topological notions of power. In doing so, I aim to contribute to geographical studies of energy by demonstrating the different arrangements by which powerful actors may reproduce their authority over energy systems. PTT has historically maintained its reach over natural gas markets through the exclusive yet contested authority of the Thai-state over domestic natural gas resources and infrastructure. However, more recently, this authority has been transformed by LNG imports and the introduction of natural gas sector reforms in Thailand. Nevertheless, I find that PTT continues to reproduce its monopoly in gas markets by quietly working through regulations, contracts, and pricing regimes
Business · Economic system · Economics · Economy · Globalization · International trade · Liberalization · Liquefied natural gas · Market economy · Monopoly · Natural gas · Natural monopoly · State (computer science · Engineering · Global Energy Security and Policy · Mining and Resource Management · Natural Resources and Economic Development
Energy, Governance and Security in Thailand and Myanmar (Burma)
Material Politics
Rethinking ‘Drop-in’ Biofuels
Material Politics
Lost Geographies of Power
Energy infrastructure and the fate of the nation
Differentiation, materiality, and power
Energy
The map is not the territory
Transformation of the water-energy nexus in Turkey
Powering neoliberalization
Post-neoliberal energy modernity and the political economy of the landlord state in Ecuador
Topological twists
Energy, governance and security in Thailand and Myanmar (Burma)
Global production networks and the extractive sector
The Political Economy of Privatization in the Thai Electricity Industry
From ‘energy geography’ to ‘energy geographies’
The 2013 Antipode AAG Lecture The Environment Making State
Assemblages of State Power
Beyond the subterranean energy regime? Fuel, land use and the production of space
The causes of Thai economic crisis
Making territory through infrastructure
New Geographies of Energy
Three spaces of power
Recovering from Crisis
Resource geography II
Making a Global Gas Market
Energopower
Carbon democracy
| Obras citantes distintas | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2020 - 2025 (6) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 6 |