The More Posed and Wise Advice’
The Fourth Earl of Dorset and the English Civil Wars
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 8955822 |
|---|---|
| Autores | David L Smith (0000-0002-6456-5444) |
| Año | 1991 |
| Volumen | 34 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 797-829 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1991-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | The Historical Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0018-246X • E-ISSN: 1469-5103 |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0018246x00017301 |
| OpenAlex | W2152299894 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 35 |
‘To me he was always the embodiment of Cavalier romance.’ Thus Vita Sackville-West on her seventeenth-century ancestor, Edward Sackville, fourth earl of Dorset. Such labelling indicates the problems which still bedevil any study of Civil War royalism. Brian Wormald's Clarendon brilliantly revealed that the men who joined Charles I in 1642 represented a broad range of opinion. Above all, he made us aware of a coherent group of moderate (‘constitutional’) royalists who throughout sought accommodation. There was a palpable difference of strategy between these people, who favoured royal concessions in order to prevent further military initiatives, and others who favoured military initiatives in order to prevent further royal concessions. Within these two basic matrices, there were further subtle inflections of attitude between individuals and within the same individual over time. But many such inflections remain murky. Wormald's lead was never followed through. Charles's supporters have consistently received less attention than those who remained with parliament; and among the royalists, moderates have attracted fewer studies than ‘cavaliers’ and ‘swordsmen’. There is thus an urgent need to clarify different varieties of royalism and especially to bring the constitutional royalists into sharper focus. However, before we can assess their wider aims and impact, we must first identify them; and here the inappropriate labels bestowed on so many of Charles's supporters create real problems. Anne Sumner has recently ‘de-mythologized’ John Digby, first earl of Bristol, revealing him as more complex and less intemperate than the ‘hawk’ of legend
Ancient history · Archaeology · Art · Art history · Genealogy · Knight · Legend · Literature · Order (exchange · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Romance · Spanish Civil War · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Classics · Historical Economic and Social Studies · History · Law · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
Parliaments and English Politics 1621–1629
Charles I and the Popish Plot
The History of the Rebellion and Civil Wars in England
The First Army Plot of 1641
Royalist finances during the English Civil War 1642–1646
History of England from the Accession of James I to the Outbreak of the Civil War, 1603–1642
Presidential Address
The First Army Plot of 1641
The Baronial Context of the English Civil War
Gentry Honor and Royalism in Early Stuart England
Saye No More
The Office and Dignity of Protector of England, with special reference to its origins
The English Nobility and the Projected Settlement of 1647
The Printing of Parliamentary Speeches November 1640–July 1642
The Opening of the Long Parliament
The Structure of the Royalist Party, 1642–1646
The Implications of Royalist Politics, 1642–1646
The Private Journals of the Long Parliament, 3 January to 5 March 1642
The Royalist Council of War, 1642-6
Cheshire, 1630-1660
A County Community in Peace and War
Unanimity in the Commons, Aristocratic Intrigues, and the Origins of the English Civil War
The Peers, the People, and Parliamentary Management in the First Six Months of the Long Parliament
The Community of Kent and the Great Rebellion
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,14 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2019 - 2019 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |