Ideal football culture

A cultural take on self‐determination theory

Datos Bibliográficos

ID8975245
AutoresJames Cresswell (0000-0002-3757-808X, Department of Behavioural Sciences Ambrose University Canada, autor de correspondencia), Cody M Rogers (0000-0001-6499-1390, Booth University College), Cody Rogers (Department of Psychology Booth University College Canada), Jon Halvorsen (Department of Psychology Booth University College Canada), Stephan Bonfield (0000-0002-3525-4436, University of Calgary Department of Clinical Neurosciences Canada)
Año2019
Volumen49
Número2
Páginas198-211
Fecha de publicación2019-01-18
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal for the Theory of Social Behaviour (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0021-8308 • E-ISSN: 1468-5914
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/jtsb.12199
OpenAlexW2909482174
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas33

This paper discusses cultural psychology and psychological training in football (soccer). Self‐Determination Theory (SDT; Deci & Ryan, 1980) has shown to be pragmatically successful in sport and suggests that being regulated by autonomous forms of motivation leads to better psychological outcomes. Cultural psychologists would be tempted to dismiss SDT because it is predicated on an a‐cultural approach to mind. It is possible to nurture a stronger and more effective team culture by reframing SDT in a cultural direction. As such, this paper outlines a cultural approach that reconceptualizes SDT in a way that retains the latter's pragmatic value while not approaching mind in a self‐contained individualist manner

Cognitive reframing · Cultural psychology · Deci · Epistemology · Ideal (ethics · Individualism · Nature versus nurture · Self-determination theory · Sociology · Value (mathematics · Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports · Psychology · Social Psychology · Social Representations and Identity · Sport Psychology and Performance