Wittgenstein, Durkheim, Garfinkel and Winch
Constitutive Orders of Sensemaking
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 8975855 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Anne Warfield Rawls (0000-0002-4044-4314, Bentley University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2011 |
| Volumen | 41 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 396-418 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2011-06-07 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0021-8308 • E-ISSN: 1468-5914 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1468-5914.2011.00471.x |
| OpenAlex | W1500548082 |
| Idioma | DE |
| Citas recibidas | 12 |
| Referencias citadas | 24 |
This paper proposes an approach to the question of meaning and understanding based on the idea of constitutive rules and their relationship to the social objects they are used to create. This approach implicates mutual attention as an essential aspect of the social processes constitutive of social objects and mutual intelligibility. Social objects as such include the meaning, perception and coherence of things, identities and talk, etc. There is a relatively unexplored but important line of argument in sociology that has, from the beginning, explained the coherence and mutual intelligibility of social objects and associations in terms of constitutive practices and social facts. This line of argument begins with Emile Durkheim (1893) and carries through the work of Harold Garfinkel to current studies of work and interaction, human computer interaction and talk. The argument is that we use constitutive practices (Constitutive rules or constitutive background expectancies) to create social objects and make coherent and shared meanings. To act is in this sense for Garfinkel ([1948]2006) to “mean”. Explaining the consistency of social objects and orders in terms of constitutive orders, rules, or practices is an approach that meets the challenges posed to social science and philosophy by Ludwig Wittgenstein (1953), Peter Winch (1958) and Paul Grice (1989)
Argument (complex analysis · Epistemology · Meaning (existential · Perception · Sociology · Digital Communication and Language · Information Systems Theories and Implementation · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology
Fenomenologiškai grindžiamos socialinės teorijos sampratos klausimu. II. Subjektyvumo problema
Durkheim’s Self-Regulating “Constitutive” Practices
Ralf Bohnsack, Praxeologische Wissenssoziologie. Opladen/Toronto
Durkheim's theory of modernity
Towards a ‘theory of the gap’
The Mechanism of the Production of Counter-finality in a Constitutive Order
Toward a Culture-Analytical and Praxeological Perspective on Decision-Making
A New Foundation for the Social Sciences? Searle’s Misreading of Durkheim
Durkheim as a sociologist of knowledge
The idea of constitutive order in ethnomethodology
Becoming a Drug Dealer
No ordinary ethics
The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation
Plans and Situated Actions
Psychology as a Science of Objective Relations
Two Concepts of Rules
How to Derive "Ought" From "Is
Bad news, good news
Philosophical investigations
Handbook of the Sociology of Morality
Situated Actions and Vocabularies of Motive
Opinions and Personality
Seeing Sociologically
A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation
The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation
The Interaction Order Sui Generis
Rules and Details
Reflections on 'Two Concepts of Rules
Two Concepts of Attachment to Rules
Rule-Following, Rule-Governance and Rule-Accord
John Rawls on Two Concepts of Rules
An Essay on Two Conceptions of Social Order
Speech Acts
| Obras citantes distintas | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,86 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2012 - 2022 (11) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 11 |