Farmers, Randlords and the South African state
Confrontation in the Witwatersrand Beef Markets, c . 1920–1923
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 8977425 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Robert Morrell (0000-0002-6096-486X, University of KwaZulu-Natal, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 1986 |
| Volumen | 27 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 513-532 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1986-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | The Journal of African History (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0021-8537 • E-ISSN: 1469-5138 |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0021853700023306 |
| OpenAlex | W2145381705 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 5 |
| Referencias citadas | 15 |
The pervasive importance of gold mining in modern South Africa has become embedded in South African historiography. Despite this, little research has been done to ascertain its impact on the other major sector of the economy, agriculture. The gold mines had a profound effect upon one particular branch of agriculture – beef farming. The mines purchased large amounts of beef and were able to use their buying power to confront beef farmers in the marketplace. In the recession following the First World War, the mines were caught in a profitability crisis that was to lead to the Rand Revolt in 1922. One of the ways in which mining attempted to ease its position was by cutting back on the cost of the meat it supplied to its African labour force. This initially involved co-operation with a powerful cold-storage company, big ranchers and a number of smaller farmers to form a Meat Producers Exchange. This fragile alliance fell apart when farmers, themselves on the verge of bankruptcy, attempted to take control of the Exchange and raise beef prices. The farmers failed and in 1923 the exchange collapsed. The victory of the mining and cold-storage companies rested on a number of factors. Farmers were unable to organize effectively because of the defection of ranchers to the mines. Changing economic conditions in 1922 and 1923 permitted the mines to terminate their co-operation with beef farmers. Finally the mines were able to call upon the state for support. The state ensured the demise of the Exchange and the defeat of the beef farmers. In the process it showed itself capable of intervening decisively to protect the interests of certain sections of capital
Agricultural economics · Agriculture · Bankruptcy · Business · Demise · Economics · Economy · Geography · Political science · Politics · Position (finance · Profitability index · Recession · State (computer science · Victory · African history and culture studies · Finance · Global Maritime and Colonial Histories · Law · South African History and Culture
The Keys to the Economic Kingdom
Cattle Circulation, Beef Market Control Strategies, and African Agropastoralists in Southern Mozambique, 1900s–30s
How White Agriculture (Re)Positioned Itself for a 'New South Africa
The British and the transfer of power in the Bechuanaland Protectorate
Crime, class and nationalism
Economy and society in pre-industrial South Africa
Studies in the Social and Economic History of the Witwatersrand, 1886-1914
Underdevelopment in Kenya
Selections from the Smuts Papers
The East African Sisal Industry, 1929–1949
Meat and Monopolies
Accommodating Imperialism
Coping with the Contradictions
Planters, peasants and the colonial state
Anglo American and the Rise of Modern South Africa
Cattle Farming in South Africa
Studies in the Social and Economic History of the Witwatersrand 1886-1914
Economy and Society in Pre-Industrial South Africa
The Meat Trade in Britain, 1840-1914
| Obras citantes distintas | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,13 |
| Intervalo de citas | 1987 - 2024 (38) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 5 |