Can A Community Evidence-based Asthma Care Program Improve Clinical Outcomes
A Longitudinal Study
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 9099136 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Ted To (0000-0001-7463-3423, University of Toronto, autor de correspondencia), Teresa To, Lisa Cicutto (University of Toronto), Naushaba Degani (0000-0001-8873-6028, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, autor de correspondencia), Susan McLimont (Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, autor de correspondencia), Joseph Beyene (0000-0002-0770-4444, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2008 |
| Volumen | 46 |
| Número | 12 |
| Páginas | 1257-1266 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2008-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Editorial | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/mlr.0b013e31817d6990 |
| PMID | 19300316 |
| OpenAlex | W1996327539 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 36 |
RATIONALE: Asthma is associated with significant morbidity. Previous studies highlight significant variations in asthma management approaches within primary care settings where the adoption of published asthma guidelines is typically suboptimal. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the implementation of an evidence-based asthma care program in community primary care settings leads to improved clinical outcomes in asthma patients. METHODS, MEASUREMENTS, AND MAIN RESULTS: A community-based participatory research project was implemented at 8 primary care practices across Ontario, Canada, consisting of elements based on the Canadian Asthma Consensus Guidelines (asthma care map, program standards, management flow chart and action plan). A total of 1408 patients aged 2-55 years participated. Conditional logistic regression analyses were used to calculate the odds ratios (OR) comparing baseline to follow-up while adjusting for age, gender, socioeconomic status and other covariates. At 12-month follow-up, there were statistically significant reductions in self-reported asthma exacerbations from 77.8% to 54.5% [OR = 0.35; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.28-0.43]; emergency room visits due to asthma from 9.9% to 5.5% (OR = 0.47; 95% CI: 0.32-0.62); school absenteeism in children from 19.9% to 10.2% (OR = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.25-0.54); productivity loss in adults from 12.0% to 10.3% (OR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.34-0.71); uncontrolled daytime asthma symptoms from 62.4% to 41.4% (OR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.27-0.42); and uncontrolled nighttime asthma symptoms from 46.4% to 25.4% (OR = 0.29; 95% CI: 0.23-0.37). CONCLUSIONS: Development and implementation of a community-based primary care asthma care program led to risk reductions in exacerbations, symptoms, urgent health service use and productivity loss related to asthma
Asthma · Confidence interval · Emergency department · Environmental health · Family medicine · Logistic regression · Odds ratio · Physical therapy · Population · Socioeconomic status · Asthma and respiratory diseases · Emergency Medicine · Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Nursing · Respiratory and Cough-Related Research
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,07 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2012 - 2012 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |