The Hipaa Authorization Form and Effects on Survey Response Rates, Nonresponse Bias, and Data Quality
A Randomized Community Study
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 9099443 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Timothy J Beebe (0000-0003-4700-2436, Mayo Clinic, autor de correspondencia), Nicholas J Talley (Center for Digestive and Liver Diseases), Michael Camilleri (0000-0001-6472-7514, Center for Digestive and Liver Diseases), Sarah M Jenkins (0000-0002-4157-8066, Department of Medical Sciences, autor de correspondencia), Kari J Anderson (Department of Medical Sciences, autor de correspondencia), G Richard Locke (Center for Digestive and Liver Diseases) |
| Año | 2007 |
| Volumen | 45 |
| Número | 10 |
| Páginas | 959-965 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2007-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Editorial | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/mlr.0b013e31805468b0 |
| PMID | 17890993 |
| OpenAlex | W2011658050 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 22 |
BACKGROUND: There has been speculation that the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) has muted participation in research but little direct evidence to substantiate those claims exists. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of including a HIPAA authorization form (HAF) on multiple measures of survey performance. RESEARCH DESIGN, SUBJECTS: A community survey of Olmsted County, Minnesota residents conducted between September 2005 and April 2006. A total of 6939 cases were randomly assigned to 2 experimental conditions where half of the subjects received a 1-page HAF (n = 3469) and the other half did not (n = 3470). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Response rate, nonresponse bias, and data quality. RESULTS: At the end of data collection, a response rate of 39.8% was observed in the HAF condition and 55.0% in the No HAF condition (P < 0.0001). There was a negligible but statistically significant (P < or = 0.001) over-representation of males in the No HAF condition but no difference in the amount of missing data between the 2 groups. However, reports of general health and the percentage of respondents indicating that they were nonsmokers were both significantly (P < or = 0.01) lower in the No HAF condition than in the HAF condition. CONCLUSIONS: Inclusion of a minimally burdensome version of the HAF reduced survey response rates by up to 15 percentage points. This could have implications for a study's statistical power. There was little evidence that the form affected nonresponse bias or data quality
Authorization · Business · Computer security · Confidentiality · Data collection · Data quality · Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act · Non-response bias · Quality (philosophy) · Response bias · Statistics · Survey data collection · Computer Science · Ethics in Clinical Research · Global Cancer Incidence and Screening · Mathematics · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Introduction to Survey Quality
Do Patient Consent Procedures Affect Participation Rates in Health Services Research
Do Characteristics of Hipaa Consent Forms Affect the Response Rate
The Impact of Privacy and Confidentiality Concerns on Survey Participation
Consequences of Reducing Nonresponse in a National Telephone Survey
Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys
Changes in Telephone Survey Nonresponse over the Past Quarter Century
Research Synthesis
Attitudes and Behavior
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,07 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2011 - 2011 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |