Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis of Diagnostic Skill
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 9099447 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Donald M Berwick (0000-0001-9507-4157, Harvard University, autor de correspondencia), L A Thibodeau (Analysis Group (United States)) |
| Año | 1983 |
| Volumen | 21 |
| Número | 9 |
| Páginas | 876-885 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1983-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Editorial | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/00005650-198309000-00004 |
| PMID | 6621117 |
| OpenAlex | W2049579752 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 3 |
In an effort to assess diagnostic skill, the authors collected estimates of the probability of positive results for 392 chest x-rays and 595 throat cultures from 56 pediatricians at different stages in training. Positivity rates were 28.6% for x-rays and 32.9% for throat cultures. The ability to predict the outcome of chest x-rays (pneumonia or not) improved with training on two measures: 1) "calibration," the accuracy of the guessed probability of positivity, and 2) "operating characteristic," the ability to sort patients with negative x-rays from patients with positive x-rays. Improvement was most marked in the ability to predict that a patient with a positive x-ray would have a positive x-ray. For throat culture results, no regular improvement was found with training either in calibration or in operating characteristic. Measurements of calibration and operating characteristic are useful for assessing the effect of training on diagnostic skill
Audiology · Calibration · Medical physics · Physical therapy · Pneumonia · Receiver operating characteristic · sort · Statistics · Throat · Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills · Innovations in Medical Education · Internal Medicine · Mathematics · Medicine · Radiology practices and education · Surgery
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |