Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Surgeons’ Perceptions of Public Reporting of Hospital and Individual Surgeon Quality

Datos Bibliográficos

ID9099489
AutoresKaren L Sherman (0000-0002-1346-4643, autor de correspondencia), Elisa J Gordon (0000-0003-0969-1998), David M Mahvi (autor de correspondencia), Jae Wan Chung (0000-0002-9015-4622, autor de correspondencia), Jeanette Chung, David J Bentrem (Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, autor de correspondencia), Jane L Holl (0000-0002-2934-1672, autor de correspondencia), Karl Y Bilimoria (0000-0001-5067-1345, autor de correspondencia)
Año2013
Volumen51
Número12
Páginas1069-1075
Fecha de publicación2013-12-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
EditorialOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0000000000000013
PMID24226305
OpenAlexW2138918360
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas3
Referencias citadas6

BACKGROUND: Hospital-specific and surgeon-specific public reporting of performance measures is expanding largely due to calls for transparency from the public and oversight agencies. Surgeons continue to voice concerns regarding public reporting. Surgeons' perceptions of hospital-level and individual-level public reporting have not been assessed. This study (1) evaluated surgeons' perceptions of public reporting of surgical quality; and (2) identified specific barriers to surgeons' acceptance of public reporting. METHODS: All surgeons (n=185) at 4 hospitals (university, children's, 2 community hospitals), representing all surgical specialties, received a 41-item anonymous Internet-based survey. Twenty follow-up qualitative interviews were conducted to assess surgeons' interpretation of findings. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 66% (n=122). Most surgeons supported public reporting of quality metrics at the hospital level (80%), but opposed individual reporting (53%, P<0.01). Fewer surgeons expected that individual (26%) or hospital (47%) public reporting would improve outcomes (P<0.01). Few indicated that their practice would change with hospital (11%) or individual (18%) public reporting (P=0.20). Primary concerns regarding public reporting at the hospital level included patients misinterpreting data, surgeons refusing high-risk patients, and outcome metric validity. Individual-surgeon level concerns included outcome metric validity, adequate sample sizes, and patients misinterpreting data. To make public reporting more acceptable, surgeons recommended patient education, simplified data presentation, continued risk-adjustment refinement, and internal review before public reporting. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons expressed concerns about public reporting of quality metrics, particularly reporting of individual surgeon performance. These concerns must be addressed to gain surgeons' acceptance and to use public reporting to improve health care quality

Family medicine · Public health · Public hospital · Quality (philosophy) · Healthcare Quality and Management · Medicine · Nursing · Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

  • Exploring the transparency mechanism and evaluating the effect of public reporting on prescription

    Open Access•Xin Du, Dan Wang et al.•BMC Public Health•2015

  • Transparência, accountability e governance

    Open Access•Carlos Nunes, Patrícia Gomes et al.•Revista de Administração Pública•2023

  • Transparency, accountability, and governance

    Open Access•Carlos Nunes, Patrícia Gomes et al.•Revista de Administração Pública•2023

  • Qualitative Data Analysis for Health Services Research

    Open Access•Elizabeth H Bradley, Leslie A Curry et al.•Health Services Research•2007

Obras citantes distintas3
Citas por año0,27
Intervalo de citas2015 - 2023 (9)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 3
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae