Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Conflicts and Concordance Between Measures of Medication Prescribing Quality

Datos Bibliográficos

ID9101212
AutoresMichael A Steinman (0000-0002-9564-9480, San Francisco VA Medical Center, autor de correspondencia), Gary E Rosenthal (0000-0003-3449-5200, Iowa City VA Health Care System), C Seth Landefeld (Quality Enhancement Research Initiative, autor de correspondencia), Daniel Bertenthal (0000-0002-8469-3259, Quality Enhancement Research Initiative), Śaunak Sen (0000-0003-4519-6361, Quality Enhancement Research Initiative), Peter J Kaboli (0000-0003-0993-0952, Iowa City VA Health Care System)
Año2007
Volumen45
Número1
Páginas95-99
Fecha de publicación2007-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
EditorialOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/01.mlr.0000241111.11991.62
PMID17279026
OpenAlexW2044244127
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas25

BACKGROUND: Several instruments commonly are used to assess the quality of medication prescribing. However, little is known about the relationship between these instruments or the concordance of their quality assessments when applied to the same group of patients. METHODS: We assessed 3 indicators of prescribing quality in a cohort of 196 veterans age 65 and older who were taking 5 or more medications. These 3 indicators assessed whether each patient was (1) taking any medication from the drugs-to-avoid criteria of Beers et al, (2) taking any medication with a score of 3 or more on the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI), and/or (3) taking 9 or more medications (polypharmacy). Kappa statistics were used to assess agreement between measures. RESULTS: Mean age was 74.6 years, and patients used a mean of 8.1 medications. Six percent of drugs were rated inappropriate by the Beers drugs-to-avoid criteria, whereas 23% of drugs received an MAI score of 3 or more. Overall agreement between these metrics was 78%, little more than expected by chance (kappa statistic 0.14, P or=9 drugs. Prescribing was classified as inappropriate by all 3 metrics in 18% of patients and as appropriate by all 3 metrics in 13%. Together, this level of agreement was slightly better than chance (3-way kappa statistic 0.08, P=0.03). Agreement remained low in sensitivity analyses using different cutoffs for the Beers criteria, a range of thresholds for MAI scores, and different definitions of polypharmacy, with kappa statistics<or=0.30 for all comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Commonly used measures of drug prescribing quality yield widely discordant results. Because the overall quality of prescribing may not be readily inferred from a single measure, multidimensional approaches will likely be necessary for robust assessment of prescribing quality

Beers Criteria · Cohen's kappa · Cohort · Concordance · Health care · Kappa · Medication error · Patient safety · Polypharmacy · Statistic · Statistics · Emergency Medicine · Internal Medicine · Mathematics · Medicine · Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes · Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions · Reliability and Agreement in Measurement

  • Clinical Practice Guidelines and Quality of Care for Older Patients With Multiple Comorbid Diseases

    Cynthia M Boyd, Jonathan Darer et al.•JAMA•2005

  • The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data

    J R Landis, Gary G Koch•Biometrics•1977

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae