Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Rethinking the Cesarean Rate

How Pregnancy Complications May Affect Interhospital Comparisons

Datos Bibliográficos

ID9101428
AutoresLisa M Korst (0000-0002-0846-7823, University of California, Los Angeles, autor de correspondencia), Jeffrey A Gornbein, Jeffrey Gornbein (0000-0001-7365-5794), Kimberly D Gregory (0000-0003-2313-9200)
Año2005
Volumen43
Número3
Páginas237-245
Fecha de publicación2005-03-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
EditorialOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/00005650-200503000-00006
PMID15725980
OpenAlexW2014548576
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas2
Referencias citadas15

BACKGROUND: The cesarean rate has served an integral role in the monitoring of obstetrical care, and in 2002, the national rate reached 26.1%, the highest ever reported. OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe the effect of clinical complications on hospital cesarean rates. RESEARCH DESIGN: This was a population-based cohort study. SUBJECTS: All laboring women without a previous cesarean who delivered in California in 1995 as reported through public-use hospital discharge data were included. MEASURES: Women with and without maternal, fetal, or placental complications were compared with respect to cesarean use. Using recursive partitioning algorithms, women with complications were stratified into clinically homogeneous categories, which were analyzed separately with respect to cesarean use. RESULTS: The 443,532 women delivered at 288 hospitals and included 116,170 women (26.2%) in the complicated group (cesarean rate 22.6%); and 327,362 women (73.8%) in the uncomplicated group (cesarean rate 6.7%). At the hospital level, the cesarean rates among the complicated and uncomplicated patients respectively were: median 23.5% (range, 2.2-9.9%); and median 6.5% (range, 1.8-18.2%). Recursive partitioning algorithms suggested 16 distinct clinical categories, with cesarean rates varying from 8.9% for women with asthma to 84.5% for women with an unengaged fetal head. CONCLUSIONS: Cesarean rates varied widely across complication types, and complication-specific rates varied widely among hospitals. Although the presence of pregnancy complications upon hospital admission comprised the strongest factor affecting first-time cesarean use among laboring women, the importance and interdependence of these clinical conditions has yet to be incorporated into commonly used models for cesarean rate comparisons

Cesarean delivery · Complication · Maternal morbidity · Obstetrics · Population · Pregnancy · Maternal and fetal healthcare · Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions · Medicine · Neonatal and fetal brain pathology · Surgery

  • Risk-adjusted cesarean section rates for the assessment of physician performance in Taiwan

    Open Access•Chao‐Hsiun Tang, Chao-Hsiun Tang et al.•BMC Public Health•2006

  • Association Between Type of Health Insurance and Elective Cesarean Deliveries

    Marco D Huesch•American Journal of Public Health•2011

  • Changes in indications for cesarean delivery

    Kimberly D Gregory, Sally C Curtin et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1998

  • Using ICD-9 codes to identify indications for primary and repeat cesarean sections

    O A Henry, Olsen Henry et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1995

  • Variation in cesarean section rates among hospitals in Washington State

    L Mckenzie, Lara B McKenzie et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1993

Obras citantes distintas2
Citas por año0,1
Intervalo de citas2006 - 2011 (6)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae