A Comprehensive Assessment of Family Physician Gender and Quality of Care
A Cross-Sectional Analysis in Ontario, Canada
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 9102014 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Simone Dahrouge (0000-0001-6488-8086, Ministry of Health and Long Term Care), Emily Seale (0000-0002-7842-4319, Ministry of Health and Long Term Care), William Hogg (0000-0002-7571-3166, Ministry of Health and Long Term Care), Gill Russell (0000-0003-3773-2355, Ministry of Health and Long Term Care), Grant Russell, Jaime Younger (Ministry of Health and Long Term Care), Elizabeth Muggah (Ministry of Health and Long Term Care), David Ponka (0000-0003-0902-8520, Ministry of Health and Long Term Care), Jay Mercer (0000-0002-0744-7468), J C G Mercer (Ministry of Health and Long Term Care) |
| Año | 2016 |
| Volumen | 54 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 277-286 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2016-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Editorial | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/mlr.0000000000000480 |
| PMID | 26765146 |
| OpenAlex | W2259569606 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 5 |
| Referencias citadas | 42 |
BACKGROUND: Studies evaluating primary care quality across physician gender are limited to primary and secondary prevention. OBJECTIVES: Investigate the relationship between family physician gender and quality of primary care using indicators that cover 5 key dimensions of primary care. RESEARCH DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis using linked health administrative datasets (April 1, 2008 to March 31, 2010). SUBJECTS: All family physicians working in the 3 main primary care models in the province of Ontario (Canada), providing general care and having a panel size >1200. MEASURES: Indicators of cancer screening (3), chronic disease management (9), continuity (2), comprehensiveness (2), and access (5). RESULTS: A total of 4195 physicians (31% female) were eligible. Adjusting for provider and patient factors, patients of female physicians were more likely to have received recommended cancer screening (odds ratios [95% confidence interval (CI)] (OR) range: 1.24 [1.18-1.30], 1.85 [1.78-1.92]) and diabetes management (OR: 1.04 [1.01-1.08], 1.28 [1.05-1.57]). They had fewer emergency room visits (rate ratio [95% CI] (RR) range: 0.83 [0.79-0.87]) and hospitalizations (RR: 0.89 [0.86-0.93]), and higher referrals (RR: 1.12 [1.09-1.14]). There was evidence of effect modification by patient gender (female vs. male) for hospitalization (RR: 0.74 [0.70-0.79] vs. 0.96 [0.90-1.02]) and emergency room visits (RR: 0.84 [0.81-0.88] vs. 0.98 [0.94-1.01]). Lower emergency room visits were also more evident in more complex patients of female physicians. There were no significant differences in the continuity or comprehensiveness measures. CONCLUSIONS: The indicators assessed in this study point to a benefit for patients under the care of female physicians. Potential explanations are discussed
Confidence interval · Cross-sectional study · Emergency department · Family medicine · Odds ratio · Primary care · Relative risk · Diversity and Career in Medicine · Emergency Medicine · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Nursing · Primary Care and Health Outcomes · Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Geocoding and Monitoring of US Socioeconomic Inequalities in Mortality and Cancer Incidence
Physician Gender Effects in Medical Communication
Assessing ecologic proxies for household income
Physician Gender Bias in Clinical Decisionmaking
Patient, Physician, and Community Factors Affecting Referrals to Specialists in Ontario, Canada
Examining the Relationship of Patients’ Attitudes and Beliefs With Their Self-Reported Level of Participation in Medical Decision-Making
Physician and Patient Gender Concordance and the Delivery of Comprehensive Clinical Preventive Services
Further Validation and Reliability Testing of the Trust in Physician Scale
Physician Gender Effects on Preventive Screening and Counseling
Gender and Medical Socialization
| Obras citantes distintas | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,56 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2017 - 2021 (5) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 4 |