Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

A Comprehensive Assessment of Family Physician Gender and Quality of Care

A Cross-Sectional Analysis in Ontario, Canada

Datos Bibliográficos

ID9102014
AutoresSimone Dahrouge (0000-0001-6488-8086, Ministry of Health and Long Term Care), Emily Seale (0000-0002-7842-4319, Ministry of Health and Long Term Care), William Hogg (0000-0002-7571-3166, Ministry of Health and Long Term Care), Gill Russell (0000-0003-3773-2355, Ministry of Health and Long Term Care), Grant Russell, Jaime Younger (Ministry of Health and Long Term Care), Elizabeth Muggah (Ministry of Health and Long Term Care), David Ponka (0000-0003-0902-8520, Ministry of Health and Long Term Care), Jay Mercer (0000-0002-0744-7468), J C G Mercer (Ministry of Health and Long Term Care)
Año2016
Volumen54
Número3
Páginas277-286
Fecha de publicación2016-03-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
EditorialOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0000000000000480
PMID26765146
OpenAlexW2259569606
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas5
Referencias citadas42

BACKGROUND: Studies evaluating primary care quality across physician gender are limited to primary and secondary prevention. OBJECTIVES: Investigate the relationship between family physician gender and quality of primary care using indicators that cover 5 key dimensions of primary care. RESEARCH DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis using linked health administrative datasets (April 1, 2008 to March 31, 2010). SUBJECTS: All family physicians working in the 3 main primary care models in the province of Ontario (Canada), providing general care and having a panel size >1200. MEASURES: Indicators of cancer screening (3), chronic disease management (9), continuity (2), comprehensiveness (2), and access (5). RESULTS: A total of 4195 physicians (31% female) were eligible. Adjusting for provider and patient factors, patients of female physicians were more likely to have received recommended cancer screening (odds ratios [95% confidence interval (CI)] (OR) range: 1.24 [1.18-1.30], 1.85 [1.78-1.92]) and diabetes management (OR: 1.04 [1.01-1.08], 1.28 [1.05-1.57]). They had fewer emergency room visits (rate ratio [95% CI] (RR) range: 0.83 [0.79-0.87]) and hospitalizations (RR: 0.89 [0.86-0.93]), and higher referrals (RR: 1.12 [1.09-1.14]). There was evidence of effect modification by patient gender (female vs. male) for hospitalization (RR: 0.74 [0.70-0.79] vs. 0.96 [0.90-1.02]) and emergency room visits (RR: 0.84 [0.81-0.88] vs. 0.98 [0.94-1.01]). Lower emergency room visits were also more evident in more complex patients of female physicians. There were no significant differences in the continuity or comprehensiveness measures. CONCLUSIONS: The indicators assessed in this study point to a benefit for patients under the care of female physicians. Potential explanations are discussed

Confidence interval · Cross-sectional study · Emergency department · Family medicine · Odds ratio · Primary care · Relative risk · Diversity and Career in Medicine · Emergency Medicine · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Nursing · Primary Care and Health Outcomes · Sex and Gender in Healthcare

  • Disentangling Evidence and Preference in Patient-Clinician Concordance Discussions

    Open Access•Leah Z Rand, Zackary Berger•The AMA Journal of Ethic•2019

  • Global Health

    Open Access•Solomon Benatar, Gillian Brock•Global Health•2021

  • Comparison of Hospital Mortality and Readmission Rates for Medicare Patients Treated by Male vs Female Physicians

    Yusuke Tsugawa, Anupam B Jena et al.•JAMA Internal Medicine•2017

  • Gender equality in science, medicine, and global health

    Open Access•Gary Shannon, Geordan Shannon et al.•The Lancet•2019

  • The Human Right to Health

    Open Access•J Wolff•Global Health•2021

  • Geocoding and Monitoring of US Socioeconomic Inequalities in Mortality and Cancer Incidence

    Nancy Krieger•American Journal of Epidemiology•2002

  • Physician Gender Effects in Medical Communication

    Debra L Roter, Debra Roter et al.•JAMA•2002

  • Assessing ecologic proxies for household income

    Open Access•Cam Mustard, Shelley Derksen et al.•Health & Place•1999

  • Physician Gender Bias in Clinical Decisionmaking

    Peter Franks, Carolyn M Clancy•Medical Care•1993

  • Patient, Physician, and Community Factors Affecting Referrals to Specialists in Ontario, Canada

    Benjamin T B Chan, Peter C Austin•Medical Care•2003

  • Examining the Relationship of Patients’ Attitudes and Beliefs With Their Self-Reported Level of Participation in Medical Decision-Making

    Navdeep K Arora, Neeraj K Arora et al.•Medical Care•2005

  • Physician and Patient Gender Concordance and the Delivery of Comprehensive Clinical Preventive Services

    Susan A Flocke, Valerie Gilchrist•Medical Care•2005

  • Further Validation and Reliability Testing of the Trust in Physician Scale

    David H Thom, Kurt M Ribisl et al.•Medical Care•1999

  • Physician Gender Effects on Preventive Screening and Counseling

    Jillian T Henderson, Carol S Weisman•Medical Care•2001

  • Gender and Medical Socialization

    Steven C Martins, Steven C Martin et al.•Journal of Health and Social…•1988

Obras citantes distintas5
Citas por año0,56
Intervalo de citas2017 - 2021 (5)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 4
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae