Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Confounding Adjustment in Comparative Effectiveness Research Conducted Within Distributed Research Networks

Datos Bibliográficos

ID9102030
AutoresSengwee Toh (0000-0002-5160-0810, Harvard University, autor de correspondencia), Joshua J Gagne (0000-0001-5428-9733, Division of Chemistry), Jeremy A Rassen (0000-0003-4369-7381, Division of Chemistry), Bruce Fireman (0000-0003-1652-985X, Kaiser Permanente), Bruce H Fireman, Martin Kulldorff (0000-0002-5284-2993, Harvard University, autor de correspondencia), Jeffrey S Brown (0000-0002-9340-7189, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, autor de correspondencia)
Año2013
Volumen51
NúmeroSupplement 8Suppl 3
PáginasS4-S10
Fecha de publicación2013-08-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
EditorialOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0b013e31829b1bb1
PMID23752258
OpenAlexW2070282739
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas4
Referencias citadas31

BACKGROUND: A distributed research network (DRN) of electronic health care databases, in which data reside behind the firewall of each data partner, can support a wide range of comparative effectiveness research (CER) activities. An essential component of a fully functional DRN is the capability to perform robust statistical analyses to produce valid, actionable evidence without compromising patient privacy, data security, or proprietary interests. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: We describe the strengths and limitations of different confounding adjustment approaches that can be considered in observational CER studies conducted within DRNs, and the theoretical and practical issues to consider when selecting among them in various study settings. RESULTS: Several methods can be used to adjust for multiple confounders simultaneously, either as individual covariates or as confounder summary scores (eg, propensity scores and disease risk scores), including: (1) centralized analysis of patient-level data, (2) case-centered logistic regression of risk set data, (3) stratified or matched analysis of aggregated data, (4) distributed regression analysis, and (5) meta-analysis of site-specific effect estimates. These methods require different granularities of information be shared across sites and afford investigators different levels of analytic flexibility. CONCLUSIONS: DRNs are growing in use and sharing of highly detailed patient-level information is not always feasible in DRNs. Methods that incorporate confounder summary scores allow investigators to adjust for a large number of confounding factors without the need to transfer potentially identifiable information in DRNs. They have the potential to let investigators perform many analyses traditionally conducted through a centralized dataset with detailed patient-level information

Alternative medicine · Comparative effectiveness research · Confounding · Econometrics · Statistics · Advanced Causal Inference Techniques · Chronic Disease Management Strategies · Computer Science · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Mathematics · Medicine

  • Privacy-preserving Analytic Methods for Multisite Comparative Effectiveness and Patient-centered Outcomes Research

    Sengwee Toh, Susan Shetterly et al.•Medical Care•2014

  • Propensity score weighting

    Open Access•Jacqueline M Burgette, John S Preisser et al.•Journal of Public Health Dentistry•2015

  • The Potential Return on Public Investment in Detecting Adverse Drug Effects

    Krista F Huybrechts, Rishi J Desai et al.•Medical Care•2017

  • Design, Implementation, and Evolution of the Medicaid Outcomes Distributed Research Network (MODRN)

    Kara Zivin, Lindsay Allen et al.•Medical Care•2022

  • Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology

    James M Robins, Miguel A Hernán et al.•Epidemiology•2000

  • Much Ado About Nothing

    Nicholas J Horton, Kim Kleinman et al.•The American Statistician•2007

  • A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period—application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect

    Open Access•James M Robins, James Robins•Mathematical Modelling•1986

  • A Structural Approach to Selection Bias

    Miguel A Hernán, Sonia Hernández-Díaz et al.•Epidemiology•2004

  • Meta-analysis in clinical trials

    Open Access•Rebecca DerSimonian, Nan M Laird et al.•Controlled Clinical Trials•1986

  • A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis

    Open Access•Peter Peduzzi, John Concato et al.•Journal of Clinical Epidemiology•1996

  • Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score

    Paul R Rosenbaum, Donald B Rubin•Journal of the American…•1984

  • Estimation of Regression Coefficients When Some Regressors are not Always Observed

    James M Robins, Andrea Rotnitzky et al.•Journal of the American…•1994

  • The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects

    Paul R Rosenbaum, Donald B Rubin•Biometrika•1983

  • Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables

    Joshua D Angrist, Guido W Imbens et al.•Journal of the American…•1996

  • Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys

    Open Access•Donald B Rubin•Multiple Imputation for…•1987

  • Basic Methods for Sensitivity Analysis of Biases

    Sander Greenland•International Journal of…•1996

  • Estimating causal effects from epidemiological data

    Miguel A Hernán, James M Robins•Journal of Epidemiology and…•2006

  • Strategies for De-identification and Anonymization of Electronic Health Record Data for Use in Multicenter Research Studies

    Clete A Kushida, Deborah A Nichols et al.•Medical Care•2012

  • Distributed Health Data Networks

    Jeffrey S Brown, John H Holmes et al.•Medical Care•2010

  • Privacy-Maintaining Propensity Score-Based Pooling of Multiple Databases Applied to a Study of Biologics

    Jeremy A Rassen, Daniel H Solomon et al.•Medical Care•2010

Obras citantes distintas4
Citas por año0,33
Intervalo de citas2014 - 2022 (9)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 3
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae