Physician Involvement in Quality Assurance
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 9102470 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Lucia S Sommers (Stanford University, autor de correspondencia), Robert Sholtz, Robert I Sholtz (University of California, Berkeley), Rodger M Shepherd (California Pacific Medical Center), David B Starkweather (University of California, Berkeley) |
| Año | 1984 |
| Volumen | 22 |
| Número | 12 |
| Páginas | 1115-1138 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1984-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Editorial | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/00005650-198412000-00006 |
| PMID | 6513620 |
| OpenAlex | W2081155148 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 3 |
Effective physician involvement in quality assurance in hospitals is necessary both to identify problems in patient care and to bring about problem resolution. This report describes a controlled, longitudinal study designed to measure effects on physician performance of involving physicians in setting medical audit criteria, reviewing audit results, and receiving concurrent reminders on a case-by-case basis. Unexpected low hemoglobin levels was the topic for audit. During phase 1 of the study, three randomly composed physician groups were involved in criteria setting plus review of audit results, review of audit results alone, or no treatment. During phase 2, 6 months later, the physicians in all three groups were exposed to 4 months of concurrent reminders. During phase 1, the group involved in review of audit results only achieved 51% compliance with the preset criteria compared with 26% for the group involved in criteria setting and review of audit results (P = 0.002). During phase 2, when concurrent reminders were provided, the group that was formerly the control group in phase 1, achieved 77% compliance as compared with 56% for the group previously involved in criteria setting and review of audit results (P = 0.004). These findings challenge the common assumption that physicians should be involved in criteria setting. They also suggest that providing the individual physician with information concurrently on a case-by-case basis may be superior to reviewing audit results for changing physician behavior
Audit · Family medicine · Medical audit · Quality assurance · Accounting · Healthcare Quality and Management · Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues · Medicine · Patient Safety and Medication Errors
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,05 |
| Intervalo de citas | 1988 - 2012 (25) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 2 |