Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Accuracy of Cancer Registry Primary Payer Information and Implications for Policy Research

Datos Bibliográficos

ID9103065
AutoresAmy J Davidoff (0000-0001-8141-9249, National Cancer Institute, autor de correspondencia), Lindsey Enewold (0000-0003-0452-5771, National Cancer Institute, autor de correspondencia), Courtney P Williams (0000-0001-5351-6340, National Cancer Institute), Courtney Williams (0000-0001-5328-7517, University of Alabama at Birmingham, autor de correspondencia), Manami Bhattacharya (0000-0003-3116-6065, National Cancer Institute, autor de correspondencia), Janeth I Sanchez (0000-0002-8069-2363, National Cancer Institute, autor de correspondencia)
Año2024
Volumen62
Número3
Páginas161-169
Fecha de publicación2024-03-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
EditorialOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0000000000001974
PMID38189658
OpenAlexW4390673339
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas13

BACKGROUND: Cancer registry-based "primary payer at diagnosis" (PPDx) data are commonly used to evaluate the effect of insurance on cancer care outcomes, yet little is known about how well they capture Medicaid or Medicare enrollment. METHODS: We linked the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry data to monthly Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Medicaid and Medicare enrollment records, state-year Medicaid policy, and managed care enrollment. We selected adults aged 19-64 years diagnosed between 2007 and 2011. We used bivariate analyses to compare PPDx to CMS enrollment at diagnosis month and assessed underreporting rates by patient characteristics and state-year policy. RESULTS: PPDx reported 7.8% Medicare and 10.1% Medicaid, whereas CMS enrollment indicated 5.5% Medicare, 10.4% Medicaid, and 3.4% dual Medicare-Medicaid (N = 896,031). Positive predictive values for PPDx assignment to Medicaid and Medicare were 65.3% and 75.4%, with false negative rates of 52.0% and 33.8%, respectively. Medicaid underreporting was higher in low (56.5%) versus high (50.8%) poverty areas, for males (56.1%) versus females (48.9%), for Medicaid poverty expansion or waiver enrolled (63.8%) versus cash assistance-related eligibility (47.3%), and in states with large managed care enrollment (all P < 0.001). If Medicaid and Medicare enrollment data were used to edit PPDx, 12.0% of persons would switch primary payer assignment. CONCLUSIONS: Registry-reported PPDx fails to fully capture Medicaid and Medicare enrollment, which may result in biased estimates of insurance-related policy impacts. Enhancement with objective enrollment data could reduce measurement error and bias in estimates necessary to support policy assessment

Cancer registry · Family medicine · Health care · Medicaid · Poverty · Waiver · Demography · Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer · Epidemiology · Global Cancer Incidence and Screening · Healthcare Policy and Management · Internal Medicine · Medicine

  • Validity of Cancer Registry Medicaid Status Against Enrollment Files

    Jo Kay Chan, Scarlett Lin Gomez et al.•Medical Care•2006

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae