Measuring Performance Directly Using the Veterans Health Administration Electronic Medical Record
A Comparison With External Peer Review
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 9103597 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Joseph L Goulet (0000-0002-0842-804X, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, autor de correspondencia), Joseph Erdos (0000-0003-4442-0683), Sue Kancir (VA Connecticut Healthcare System), Forrest L Levin (0000-0001-6866-1815, VA Connecticut Healthcare System), Steven M Wright, Stanlie M Daniels, Lynnette Nilan, Amy C Justice (0000-0003-0139-5502, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2007 |
| Volumen | 45 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 73-79 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2007-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Editorial | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/01.mlr.0000244510.09001.e5 |
| PMID | 17279023 |
| PMCID | PMC3460379 |
| OpenAlex | W2048230186 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 12 |
| Referencias citadas | 17 |
BACKGROUND: Electronic medical records systems (EMR) contain many directly analyzable data fields that may reduce the need for extensive chart review, thus allowing for performance measures to be assessed on a larger proportion of patients in care. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to determine the extent to which selected chart review-based clinical performance measures could be accurately replicated using readily available and directly analyzable EMR data. METHODS: A cross-sectional study using full chart review results from the Veterans Health Administration's External Peer Review Program (EPRP) was merged to EMR data. RESULTS: Over 80% of the data on these selected measures found in chart review was available in a directly analyzable form in the EMR. The extent of missing EMR data varied by site of care (P<0.01). Among patients on whom both sources of data were available, we found a high degree of correlation between the 2 sources in the measures assessed (correlations of 0.89-0.98) and in the concordance between the measures using performance cut points (kappa: 0.86-0.99). Furthermore, there was little evidence of bias; the differences in values were not clinically meaningful (difference of 0.9 mg/dL for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, 1.2 mm Hg for systolic blood pressure, 0.3 mm Hg for diastolic, and no difference for HgbA1c). CONCLUSIONS: Directly analyzable data fields in the EMR can accurately reproduce selected EPRP measures on most patients. We found no evidence of systematic differences in performance values among these with and without directly analyzable data in the EMR
Chart · Checklist · Concordance · Concordance correlation coefficient · Electronic health record · Electronic medical record · Health care · Medical record · Statistics · Veterans Affairs · Computer Science · Electronic Health Records Systems · Emergency Medicine · Internal Medicine · Mathematics · Medical Coding and Health Information · Medicine · Primary Care and Health Outcomes · Psychology
Agreement Between Hedis Performance Assessments in the VA and Medicare Advantage
Systematically assessing the quality of dental electronic health record data for an investigation into oral health care disparities
In Data We Trust? Comparison of Electronic Versus Manual Abstraction of Antimicrobial Prescribing Quality Metrics for Hospitalized Veterans With Pneumonia
A Decade With the Chronic Care Model
Increased Documented Brief Alcohol Interventions With a Performance Measure and Electronic Decision Support
Should We Add Clinical Variables to Administrative Data
Linkage of Laboratory Results to Medicare Fee-for-Service Claims
Improving Hypertension Quality Measurement Using Electronic Health Records
Retooling of Paper-based Outcome Measures to Electronic Format
Agreement Between Electronic Medical Record-based and Self-administered Pain Numeric Rating Scale
Evaluating the Impact of Integrated Care on Service Utilization in Serious Mental Illness
Adult obesity prevalence in primary care users
Systematic Review
Effect of the Transformation of the Veterans Affairs Health Care System on the Quality of Care
Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology.
Reinventing VA Health Care
Benchmarking Veterans Affairs Medical Centers in the Delivery of Preventive Health Services
Benefit-Cost Analysis of Brief Physician Advice With Problem Drinkers in Primary Care Settings
The Veterans Affairs Healthcare System
Validity of Using an Electronic Medical Record for Assessing Quality of Care in an Outpatient Setting
Case-Finding for Depression Among Medical Outpatients in the Veterans Health Administration
| Obras citantes distintas | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,63 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2007 - 2024 (18) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 12 |