Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Magnet Hospitals and 30-Day Readmission and Mortality Rates for Medicare Beneficiaries

Datos Bibliográficos

ID9104076
AutoresHanadi Y Hamadi (University of North Florida), Hanadi Hamadi (0000-0001-9050-7267, University of North Florida, autor de correspondencia), Dayana Martinez (University of North Florida, autor de correspondencia), Julia Palenzuela (University of North Florida, autor de correspondencia), Aaron Spaulding (0000-0001-9727-6756, Mayo Clinic in Florida), Aaron C Spaulding (Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern, Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL)
Año2021
Volumen59
Número1
Páginas6-12
Fecha de publicación2021-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
EditorialOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0000000000001427
PMID32925454
OpenAlexW3084464716
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas33

BACKGROUND: US hospitals are penalized for excess 30-day readmissions and mortality for select conditions. Under the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services policy, readmission prevention is incentivized to a greater extent than mortality reduction. A strategy to potentially improve hospital performance on either measure is by improving nursing care, as nurses provide the largest amount of direct patient care. However, little is known as to whether achieving nursing excellence, such as Magnet status, is associated with improved hospital performance on readmissions and mortality. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between hospitals' Magnet status and performance on readmission and mortality rates for Medicare beneficiaries. RESEARCH DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional analysis of Medicare readmissions and mortality reduction programs from 2013 to 2016. A propensity score-matching approach was used to take into account differences in baseline characteristics when comparing Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals. SUBJECTS: The sample was comprised of 3877 hospitals. MEASURES: The outcome measures were 30-day risk-standardized readmission and mortality rates. RESULTS: Following propensity score matching on hospital characteristics, we found that Magnet hospitals outperformed non-Magnet hospitals in reducing mortality; however, Magnet hospitals performed worse in reducing readmissions for acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, and stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Magnet hospitals performed better on the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Mortality Program than the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program. The results of this study suggest the need for The Magnet Recognition Program to examine the role of nurses in postdischarge activities as a component of its evaluation criteria

Health care · Medicaid · Medical emergency · Mortality rate · Operations management · Propensity score matching · Purchasing · Value-Based Purchasing · Emergency Medicine · Heart Failure Treatment and Management · Hospital Admissions and Outcomes · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

  • Individual performance-based incentives for health care workers in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries

    Open Access•Tracy Kuo Lin, Kalin Werner et al.•Health Policy•2022

  • Hospital Nursing and 30-Day Readmissions Among Medicare Patients With Heart Failure, Acute Myocardial Infarction, and Pneumonia

    Matthew D McHugh, Chenjuan Ma•Medical Care•2013

  • The Association of Registered Nurse Staffing Levels and Patient Outcomes

    Robert L Kane, Tatyana A Shamliyan et al.•Medical Care•2007

  • Nurse Staffing and Mortality for Medicare Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Sharina D Person, Sharina Person et al.•Medical Care•2004

  • Changes in Patient and Nurse Outcomes Associated With Magnet Hospital Recognition

    Ann Kutney-Lee, Amy Witkoski Stimpfel et al.•Medical Care•2015

  • Is There a Business Case for Magnet Hospitals? Estimates of the Cost and Revenue Implications of Becoming a Magnet

    Jayani Jayawardhana, John M Welton et al.•Medical Care•2014

Obras citantes distintas1
Citas por año0,25
Intervalo de citas2022 - 2022 (1)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae