Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Respondent Selection by Mail

Obtaining Probability Samples of Health Plan Enrollees

Datos Bibliográficos

ID9104092
AutoresPatricia M Gallagher (0000-0001-9844-8978, University of Massachusetts Boston, autor de correspondencia), Floyd Jackson Fowler (0000-0001-5889-6362, University of Massachusetts Boston), Vickie L Stringfellow (0000-0002-9474-0100, University of Massachusetts Boston)
Año1999
Volumen37
NúmeroSUPPLEMENT
PáginasMS50-MS58
Fecha de publicación1999-03-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
EditorialOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/00005650-199903001-00006
PMID10098559
OpenAlexW2023473091
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas3
Referencias citadas5

OBJECTIVES: This study was done to assess the feasibility of respondent selection by mail to obtain random samples of both child and adult enrollees of health plans when only subscriber contact information is available. METHODS: The subjects were enrollees of health plans covered under the policies of employees of the State of Washington. Subscribers were eligible for inclusion in the study samples if they had been enrolled for at least 6 months and, depending on the test, had at least one child and/or a spouse enrolled under their policy. Subjects were randomly assigned to six groups: three approaches for sampling children, two approaches for sampling adults, and one test of parents' willingness to return a questionnaire about themselves. Child selection protocols involved asking respondents to complete either a child-only or a dual questionnaire, asking them to follow a decision rule to choose a sample person, and collecting data in two phases, asking respondents to return material twice. RESULTS: Results indicated that asking subscribers to select an adult respondent by mail was not a success. At least given the procedures we used, adults did not demonstrate good compliance with the respondent selection process offered them. In contrast, parents proved willing to follow a more complicated child selection rule and to do it nearly perfectly. CONCLUSIONS: Parents will follow a decision rule to select an eligible child, but requiring this additional respondent selection step may be associated with a slightly decreased response rate. Asking parents to return materials twice is feasible, but it is too cumbersome a procedure to be practical. It is possible to collect data about both an adult and a child using a dual instrument; however, the increase in information is tempered by a decrease in response rates

Data science · Machine learning · Political science · Respondent · Selection (genetic algorithm) · Computer Science · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Psychology · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse · Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques

  • The Impact of Having Parents Report About Both Their Own and Their Children's Experiences With Health Insurance Plans

    James A Shaul, Floyd Jackson Fowler et al.•Medical Care•1999

  • Assessing Within-Household Selection Methods in Household Mail Surveys

    Kristen Olson, Mathew Stange et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2014

  • Accuracy of Within-household Selection in Web and Mail Surveys of the General Population

    Open Access•K Olson, Jolene D Smyth•CAM•2014

  • Introduction to Survey Sampling

    Graham Kalton•Introduction to Survey Sampling•1983

  • Mail and Telephone Surveys

    Earl Babbie, Don A Dillman•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1982

  • The Impact of Having Parents Report About Both Their Own and Their Children's Experiences With Health Insurance Plans

    James A Shaul, Floyd Jackson Fowler et al.•Medical Care•1999

  • Handbook of Survey Research

    Stanley Presser, Peter H Rossi et al.•Social Forces•1985

Obras citantes distintas3
Citas por año0,11
Intervalo de citas1999 - 2014 (16)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 3
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae