Accuracy of Risk-Adjusted Mortality Rate As a Measure of Hospital Quality of Care
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 9104318 |
|---|---|
| Autores | J W Thomas (0000-0002-2098-6458, Department of Health Services, autor de correspondencia), Timothy P Hofer (0000-0003-0434-8787) |
| Año | 1999 |
| Volumen | 37 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 83-92 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1999-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Editorial | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/00005650-199901000-00012 |
| PMID | 10413396 |
| OpenAlex | W2332141632 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 13 |
| Referencias citadas | 12 |
OBJECTIVES: Reports on hospital quality performance are being produced with increasing frequency by state agencies, commercial data vendors, and health care purchasers. Risk-adjusted mortality rate is the most commonly used measure of quality in these reports. The purpose of this study was to determine whether risk-adjusted mortality rates are valid indicators of hospital quality performance. METHODS: Based on an analytical model of random measurement error, sensitivity and predictive error of mortality rate indicators of hospital performance were estimated. RESULTS: The following six parameters were shown to determine accuracy: (1) mortality risks of patients who receive good quality care and (2) of those who receive poor quality care, (3) proportion of patients (across all hospitals) who receive poor quality care, (4) proportion of hospitals considered to be "poor quality," (5) patients' relative risk of receiving poor quality care in "good quality" and in "poor quality" hospitals, and (6) number of patients treated per hospital. Using best available values for model parameters, analyses demonstrated that in nearly all situations, even with perfect risk adjustment, identifying poor quality hospitals on the basis of mortality rate performance is highly inaccurate. Of hospitals that delivered poor quality care, fewer than 12% were identified as high mortality rate outliers, and more than 60% of outliers were actually good quality hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Under virtually all realistic assumptions for model parameter values, sensitivity was less than 20% and predictive error was greater than 50%. Reports that measure quality using risk-adjusted mortality rates misinform the public about hospital performance
Health care · Mortality rate · Operations management · Quality (philosophy) · Quality management · Statistics · Emergency Medicine · Healthcare Policy and Management · Medicine · Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare · Primary Care and Health Outcomes · Surgery
Patient Safety Outcomes in Small Urban and Small Rural Hospitals
Competition and Quality
Why Rescue the Administrative Data Version of the “Failure to Rescue” Quality Indicator
Postoperative Mortality and Pulmonary Complication Rankings
Risk-Adjusted Mortality Rates as a Potential Outcome Indicator for Outpatient Quality Assessments
Performance of the ACG Case-Mix System in Two Canadian Provinces
The Impact of Under Coding of Cardiac Severity and Comorbid Diseases on the Accuracy of Hospital Report Cards
A Decade of Mortality Reductions in Major Oncologic Surgery
The Hospital Standardized Mortality Ratio Fallacy
Effect of Definition of Mortality on Hospital Profiles
Aplicação da mortalidade hospitalar após a realização de cirurgia de revascularização do miocárdio para monitoramento do cuidado hospitalar
Validity of the risk adjustment approach to compare outcomes
Downsizing within a hospital
| Obras citantes distintas | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,52 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2001 - 2012 (12) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 13 |