Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Using Electronic Health Records to Measure Physician Performance for Acute Conditions in Primary Care

Empirical Evaluation of the Community-Acquired Pneumonia Clinical Quality Measure Set

Datos Bibliográficos

ID9104474
AutoresJeffrey A Linder (0000-0003-2217-184X, Brigham and Women's Hospital, autor de correspondencia), Erin O Kaleba, Karen S Kmetik (American Medical Association)
Año2009
Volumen47
Número2
Páginas208-216
Fecha de publicación2009-02-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
EditorialOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0b013e318189375f
PMID19169122
OpenAlexW2038049252
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas3
Referencias citadas33

BACKGROUND: Electronic health records (EHRs) have the potential to facilitate performance measurement for acute conditions. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability and feasibility-of-use of a performance measure set for community-acquired pneumonia in an ambulatory EHR. DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional electronic chart review. SETTING: Primary Care Clinics. PATIENTS: Adults with an administrative claims diagnosis of pneumonia during a 14-month period. MEASUREMENTS: Two reviewers independently examined data in the EHR to determine if (1) the encounter was a visit for acute pneumonia; (2) there was documentation for each of 12 performance measures; and (3) such information was in coded form. RESULTS: Of 688 encounters with a claim diagnosis of pneumonia, 210 (31%) were identified by either reviewer as a primary care acute pneumonia visit. The 2 reviewers agreed that 198 encounters to 71 different clinicians were visits for acute pneumonia [kappa, 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.93-0.98]. Measure performance ranged from 10% for providing location of care rationale to 91% for documenting blood pressure, averaging 52% across all 12 measures. Inter-rater reliability ranged from 0.66 (95% CI, 0.47-0.84) for providing a location of care rationale to 0.97 (95% CI, 0.91-1.0) for vital sign assessment. The proportion of data that was in coded form ranged from 0% for mental status, hydration status, chest x-ray performance, and location of care to 100% for medications and immunizations. CONCLUSIONS: Although EHRs offer potential advantages for performance measurement for acute conditions, accurate identification of pneumonia visits was challenging, performance generally appeared poor, and much of the data were not in coded form

Acute care · Ambulatory · Ambulatory care · Confidence interval · Documentation · Electronic health record · Family medicine · Health care · Intensive care medicine · Medical emergency · MEDLINE · Pneumonia · Reliability (semiconductor) · Electronic Health Records Systems · Emergency Medicine · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Primary Care and Health Outcomes · Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

  • The Adoption and Use of Health Information Technology in Rural Areas

    Open Access•Ranjit Singh, Michael I Lichter et al.•The Journal of Rural Health•2012

  • In Data We Trust? Comparison of Electronic Versus Manual Abstraction of Antimicrobial Prescribing Quality Metrics for Hospitalized Veterans With Pneumonia

    Barbara Jones, Barbara E Jones et al.•Medical Care•2018

  • Retooling of Paper-based Outcome Measures to Electronic Format

    Edward L Hannan, Stacey C Barrett et al.•Medical Care•2019

  • Assessing the Accuracy of Administrative Data in Health Information Systems

    John W Peabody, John Peabody et al.•Medical Care•2004

  • Validity of Using an Electronic Medical Record for Assessing Quality of Care in an Outpatient Setting

    Andrea L Benin, Grace Vitkauskas et al.•Medical Care•2005

Obras citantes distintas3
Citas por año0,21
Intervalo de citas2012 - 2019 (8)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 3
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae