Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Changes Over Time in the Use of Do Not Resuscitate Orders and the Outcomes of Patients Receiving Them

Datos Bibliográficos

ID9104495
AutoresNeil Wenger (0000-0002-9884-3967, Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, autor de correspondencia), Neil S Wenger, Marjorie L Pearson (RAND Corporation), Katherine A Desmond (Comprehensive Blood & Cancer Center), Katherine L Kahn (RAND Corporation, autor de correspondencia)
Año1997
Volumen35
Número4
Páginas311-319
Fecha de publicación1997-04-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
EditorialOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/00005650-199704000-00003
PMID9107201
OpenAlexW2123698548
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas23

OBJECTIVES: Do not resuscitate (DNR) orders are increasingly common, though there has been little evaluation of their changing use. The authors contrasted the use and outcomes of DNR orders for nationally representative samples of Medicare patients hospitalized with specific diagnoses in 1981 to 1982 and 1985 to 1986. METHODS: Using ordinary least squares regression to adjust for patient and hospital characteristics, the authors compared use, timing and predictors of DNR orders, and survival to hospital discharge of patients with DNR orders between the two time periods. RESULTS: After adjustment for sickness at admission and for patient and hospital factors, more patients received DNR orders in 1985 to 1986 than in 1981 to 1982 (13% versus 10%, P < 0.001), with most of the increase among patients with the greatest sickness at admission. Disparity in DNR order use by age, diagnosis, functional status, preadmission residence, and gender found in 1981 to 1982 was still present in 1985 to 1986. DNR orders were written earlier in hospitalization during the latter time period. Patients with DNR orders were more likely to survive to hospital discharge in 1985 to 1986 than in 1981 to 1982 (44% versus 36%, P = 0.001), but their 30-day survival did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: Although use increased, disparities in DNR order assignment persisted in these 1980s data. Examination is needed into whether these differences persist and whether they reflect patient preferences. Systems should be developed to preserve and review the preferences of the increasing number of patients discharged after in-hospital DNR orders

Do not resuscitate · Do Not Resuscitate Order · Intensive care medicine · Residence · Demography · Emergency Medicine · Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints · Medicine · Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues · Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment · Pediatrics

  • Rate of Utilization and Determinants of Withdrawal of Care in Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated With Thrombolytics in USA

    Adnan I Qureshi, Malik M Adil et al.•Medical Care•2013

Obras citantes distintas1
Citas por año0,08
Intervalo de citas2013 - 2013 (1)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae