Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Determination of Colonoscopy Indication From Administrative Claims Data

Datos Bibliográficos

ID9104854
AutoresCynthia W Ko (0000-0002-7107-3683, University of Washington, autor de correspondencia), Jason A Dominitz (0000-0002-8070-7086, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, autor de correspondencia), Moni Neradilek, Moni B Neradilek (0000-0002-3154-6597, The Mount), Nayak Polissar, Nayak L Polissar (The Mount), Pam Green, William Kreuter (University of Washington), Laura-Mae Baldwin, Laura–Mae Baldwin
Año2014
Volumen52
Número4
Páginase21-e29
Fecha de publicación2014-04-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
EditorialOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0b013e31824ebdf5
PMID22437619
PMCIDPMC3387505
OpenAlexW2009589729
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas2
Referencias citadas3

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy outcomes, such as polyp detection or complication rates, may differ by procedure indication. OBJECTIVES: To develop methods to classify colonoscopy indications from administrative data, facilitating study of colonoscopy quality and outcomes. RESEARCH DESIGN: We linked 14,844 colonoscopy reports from the Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative, a national repository of endoscopic reports, to the corresponding Medicare Carrier and Outpatient File claims. Colonoscopy indication was determined from the procedure reports. We developed algorithms using classification and regression trees and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) to classify colonoscopy indication. Predictor variables included ICD-9CM and CPT/HCPCS codes present on the colonoscopy claim or in the 12 months prior, patient demographics, and site of colonoscopy service. Algorithms were developed on a training set of 7515 procedures, then validated using a test set of 7329 procedures. RESULTS: Sensitivity was lowest for identifying average-risk screening colonoscopies, varying between 55% and 86% for the different algorithms, but specificity for this indication was consistently over 95%. Sensitivity for diagnostic colonoscopy varied between 77% and 89%, with specificity between 55% and 87%. Algorithms with classification and regression trees with 7 variables or LDA with 10 variables had similar overall accuracy, and generally lower accuracy than the algorithm using LDA with 30 variables. CONCLUSIONS: Algorithms using Medicare claims data have moderate sensitivity and specificity for colonoscopy indication, and will be useful for studying colonoscopy quality in this population. Further validation may be needed before use in alternative populations

Cancer · Colonoscopy · Colorectal cancer · Linear discriminant analysis · Population · Artificial Intelligence · Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection · Computer Science · Global Cancer Incidence and Screening · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Microscopic Colitis

  • Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake

    Open Access•Mesnad Alyabsi, Jane L Meza et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2020

  • Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Nationwide High-deductible Health Plan Before and After the Affordable Care Act

    J Frank Wharam, Fang Zhang et al.•Medical Care•2016

Obras citantes distintas2
Citas por año0,2
Intervalo de citas2016 - 2020 (5)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae