The Effects of Patient Volume on the Quality of Diabetic Care for Medicare Beneficiaries
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 9104886 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Eric S Holmboe (0000-0003-0108-6021, Qualidigm (United States), autor de correspondencia), Yun Wang (0009-0006-5841-3627, Qualidigm (United States), autor de correspondencia), Janet P Tate (Qualidigm (United States), autor de correspondencia), Thomas P Meehan (0000-0002-0788-7498, Yale University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2006 |
| Volumen | 44 |
| Número | 12 |
| Páginas | 1073-1077 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2006-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Editorial | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/01.mlr.0000233685.22497.cf |
| PMID | 17122710 |
| OpenAlex | W2033094276 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 4 |
| Referencias citadas | 19 |
BACKGROUND: The quality of care for Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes remains suboptimal. The contributing factors at the physician level are not well characterized, especially the relationship of patient volume and physician performance. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine associations between the number of Medicare diabetic patients cared for by a primary care physician and the receipt of important diabetic processes of care. DESIGN: Physicians were grouped into quintiles based on the number of Medicare patients with diabetes. Hierarchical generalized linear models were used to examine associations between number of patients, frequency of visits, physician experience, patient factors and the receipt of diabetes processes of care using Part A and B Medicare claims data for 2001. PARTICIPANTS AND PATIENTS: All Connecticut primary care physicians who cared for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with diabetes in 2001. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were associations of the receipt of diabetes process of care measures with the number of diabetic Medicare patients in a physician practice panel, adjusted for frequency of visits, patient comorbidity, age, ethnicity, and physician experience. RESULTS: Patients in the highest volume physician quintile were significantly more likely to have received hemoglobin A1c measurements, lipid profiles, and retinal eye examinations than patients in the lowest physician quintile in 2001, even after adjustment for multiple factors. For each step up in quintile volume group among primary care physicians, the increased odds of receiving a hemoglobin A1c measurement was 1.16 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-1.23), 1.12 (95% CI 1.07-1.18) for a lipid profile, 1.06 (95% CI 1.02-1.09) for a retinal eye examination, and 1.48 (95% CI 1.22-1.81) for receiving all 3 measures. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that Medicare fee-for-service patients with diabetes cared for by physicians with greater numbers of diabetic Medicare patients in their practice are more likely to receive important diabetes processes of care
Business · Diabetes mellitus · Family medicine · Intensive care medicine · MEDLINE · Quality (philosophy) · Volume (thermodynamics) · Chemistry · Diabetes Management and Education · Endocrinology · Healthcare Policy and Management · Medicine · Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Improving Primary Care for Patients With Chronic Illness
Improving Primary Care for Patients With Chronic Illness
Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases
Systematic Review
The Quality of Health Care Delivered to Adults in the United States
Is Volume Related to Outcome in Health Care? A Systematic Review and Methodologic Critique of the Literature
A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies
Relationship Between Continuity of Care and Diabetes Control
Provider Type and the Receipt of General and Diabetes-Related Preventive Health Services Among Patients With Diabetes
Specialty Differences in the Care of Older Patients With Diabetes
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,21 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2007 - 2019 (13) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 4 |