Rethinking the Role of Small-Group Collaborators and Adversaries in the London Kleinian Development (1914–1968)

Datos Bibliográficos

ID9233186
AutoresJoseph Aguayo (0000-0002-5518-7816, Training and Supervising Analyst at the Psychoanalytic Center of California, Los Angeles, and a guest member of the British Psychoanalytical Society.), Agnes Regeczkey (Psychoanalytic candidate at the New Center for Psychoanalysis Los Angeles)
Año2016
Volumen85
Número3
Páginas695-725
Fecha de publicación2016-07-01
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaThe Psychoanalytic Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0033-2828 • E-ISSN: 2167-4086
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/psaq.12090
PMID27428585
OpenAlexW2485767926
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas12

The authors historically situate the London Kleinian development in terms of the small-group collaborations and adversaries that arose during the course of Melanie Klein's career. Some collaborations later became personally adversarial (e.g., those Klein had with Glover and Schmideberg); other adversarial relationships forever remained that way (with A. Freud); while still other long-term collaborations became theoretically contentious (such as with Winnicott and Heimann). After the Controversial Discussions in 1944, Klein marginalized one group of supporters (Heimann, Winnicott, and Riviere) in favor of another group (Rosenfeld, Segal, and Bion). After Klein's death in 1960, Bion maintained loyalty to Klein's ideas while quietly distancing his work from the London Klein group, immigrating to the United States in 1968

Adversarial system · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) · Distancing · Group (periodic table) · Humility · Political science · Psychoanalysis · Sociology · Theology · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology · Law · Medicine · Philosophy · Psychoanalysis and Social Critique · Psychology · Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications