Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Gallus and The Culex

Datos Bibliográficos

ID9328512
AutoresDuncan F Kennedy (University of Liverpool, autor de correspondencia)
Año1982
Volumen32
Número2
Páginas371-389
Fecha de publicación1982-12-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaThe Classical Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0009-8388 • E-ISSN: 1471-6844
EditorialCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0009838800026550
OpenAlexW2041933287
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas35
Referencias citadas11

The Culex remains the most bewildering of poems. The consensus of modern opinion holds that it is a deliberate forgery, post-Ovidian in date, purporting to be a work of the youthful Virgil and thus serving to fill the large biographical vacuum in the career of the poet before the publication of the Eclogues . If this is the case, it must be asked why the forger chose to fill that gap with a poem thematically and stylistically so idiosyncratic which nevertheless managed to gain ready acceptance as Virgilian by the end of the first century A.D. This is a very large question, but in postulating the close dependence of parts of the poem on Cornelius Gallus (I), particularly on his symbolism of poetic inspiration (II–V), I hope to go some of the way towards providing an answer (VI). If this article is directed primarily at the problem of the Culex , I would like to think it makes a contribution also to the much more important study of Gallus, whose reputation has suffered somewhat since the publication of those wretched lines from Qasr Ibrîm. Yet, if not a single line of his work had survived, the one thing we could say of his poetry with confidence is that it inspired. Anyone trying to make an assessment of Gallus' poetic achievement should first make a close study of Virgil's Sixth and Tenth Eclogues and then ask whether fragments have ever formed a firm basis for the evaluation of an author's work. Rehabilitation should not be necessary

Aesthetics · Art · Chose · Literature · Poetry · Political science · Reputation · Classical Antiquity Studies · History · Law · Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods · Philosophy

  • Virgils, from Dante to Milton

    Open Access•Colin Burrow•The Cambridge Companion to Virgil•1997

  • Rome and its traditions

    Open Access•James E G Zetzel•The Cambridge Companion to Virgil•1997

  • Virgil and tragedy

    Open Access•Philip Hardie•The Cambridge Companion to Virgil•1997

  • Sons and lovers

    Open Access•Ellen Oliensis•The Cambridge Companion to Virgil•1997

  • Virgilian didaxis

    Open Access•William W Batstone, William Batstone•The Cambridge Companion to Virgil•1997

  • The Virgil commentary of Servius

    Open Access•Don Fowler•The Cambridge Companion to Virgil•1997

  • Aspects of Virgil's reception in antiquity

    Open Access•R J Tarrant, Richard Tarrant•The Cambridge Companion to Virgil•1997

  • Poetry and Power

    Open Access•Richard Tarrant•Cambridge Companion to Virgil•2019

  • Virgil’s Intertextual Personae

    Open Access•J Farrell•Cambridge Companion to Virgil•2019

  • Virgil

    Open Access•Fiachra Mac Góráin•Cambridge Companion to Virgil•2019

  • Character in Virgil

    Open Access•Helen Lovatt•Cambridge Companion to Virgil•2019

  • Virgil in Art

    Open Access•L B T Houghton•Cambridge Companion to Virgil•2019

  • Sons and Lovers

    Open Access•Ellen Oliensis•Cambridge Companion to Virgil•2019

  • Virgil and Tragedy

    Open Access•Philip Hardie•Cambridge Companion to Virgil•2019

  • Rome and its Traditions

    Open Access•James E G Zetzel•Cambridge Companion to Virgil•2019

  • Virgil’s Style

    Open Access•James J O’Hara•Cambridge Companion to Virgil•2019

  • Virgilian Didaxis

    Open Access•William W Batstone•Cambridge Companion to Virgil•2019

  • The Virgil Commentary of Servius

    Open Access•Don Fowler, Sergio Casali et al.•Cambridge Companion to Virgil•2019

  • Virgilian Epic

    Open Access•Duncan F Kennedy•Cambridge Companion to Virgil•2019

  • The Death of Virgil

    Open Access•Fiona Cox•Cambridge Companion to Virgil•2019

  • Virgilian Narrative

    Open Access•Don Fowler, Alessandro Barchiesi•Cambridge Companion to Virgil•2019

  • The Appendix Vergiliana

    Open Access•Scott Mcgill•Cambridge Companion to Virgil•2019

  • Post-classical Commentary

    Open Access•Sergio Casali, Fabio Stok•Cambridge Companion to Virgil•2019

  • Aspects of Virgil’s Reception in Antiquity

    Open Access•Richard Tarrant•Cambridge Companion to Virgil•2019

  • Closure and the Book of Virgil

    Open Access•Elena Theodorakopoulos•Cambridge Companion to Virgil•2019

  • Virgil as a Poet

    Open Access•Victoria Moul•Cambridge Companion to Virgil•2019

  • Virgilian Narrative

    Open Access•Alessandro Barchiesi•Cambridge Companion to Virgil•2019

  • Green Politics

    Open Access•Charles Martindale•Cambridge Companion to Virgil•2019

  • Virgil and the cosmos

    Open Access•Susanna Morton Braund, Susanna Braund•The Cambridge Companion to Virgil•1997

  • Caligantem nigra formidine lucum

    Paola Gagliardi•Philologus•2023

  • The Cambridge Companion to Virgil

    Open Access•Charles Martindale, Fiachra Mac Góráin•Cambridge Companion to Virgil•2019

  • La réception d’Empédocle dans la poésie latine

    Open Access•Jacqueline Fabre-Serris•Dictynna•2014

  • A Stichometric Allusion to Catullus 64 in the Culex

    Open Access•Dunstan Lowe•The Classical Quarterly•2015

  • The Culex ’s Metapoetic Funerary Garden

    Open Access•K Sara Myers•The Classical Quarterly•2020

  • Did Gallus Write ‘Pastoral’ Elegies

    Open Access•Richard Whitaker•The Classical Quarterly•1988

  • Backgrounds to Augustan poetry

    David O Ross•Backgrounds to Augustan poetry•1975

  • History in Ovid

    Ronald Syme•History in Ovid•1978

  • The Neoteric Poets

    Open Access•R O A M Lyne, Raphael Lyne•The Classical Quarterly•1978

  • Propertius, 2. 30 A and B

    Open Access•Francis Cairns•The Classical Quarterly•1971

  • Style and Tradition in Catullus

    David O Ross•Style and Tradition in Catullus•1969

  • Beitrage zur Datierung des Culex

    Anthony A Barrett, Dieter Guntzschel•Phoenix•1972

  • Ovid's Heroides

    William S Anderson, Howard Jacobson•Phoenix•1976

Obras citantes distintas35
Citas por año0,92
Intervalo de citas1988 - 2023 (36)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 35
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae