Denial of Justice in International Law

Datos Bibliográficos

ID9541445
AutoresClyde Eagleton (New York University, autor de correspondencia)
Año1928
Volumen22
Número3
Páginas538-559
Fecha de publicación1928-07-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaAmerican Journal of International Law (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0002-9300 • E-ISSN: 2161-7953
EditorialCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2188742
OpenAlexW2333599435
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas7

The responsibility of the state in international law is a subject of constantly increasing interest, whether to the practicing lawyer, who finds himself called upon to prepare an international claim, or to the theoretician, interested, perhaps, in the current codification of international law. 1 Of the many problems connected with state responsibility, one of the most interesting, and at the same time one of the most vital,is that of the proper denotation to be given to the phrase “ denial of justice.” Most debates hinge upon definitions; and a consistent statement of the rules of responsibility would seem impossible until denial of justice is given clearer definition.It is believed that practice now affords us enough consideration of the meaning of the term to permit of analysis and of more precise definition

Denial · Denotation (semiotics · Economic Justice · Epistemology · International law · Law and economics · Linguistics · Meaning (existential · Phrase · Political science · Sociology · State (computer science · Statement (logic · Subject (documents · Computer Science · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Law and Human Rights · Law · Philosophy · Psychology