Jan Mayen in Perspective

Datos Bibliográficos

ID9554161
AutoresElliot L Richardson (autor de correspondencia)
Año1988
Volumen82
Número3
Páginas443-458
Fecha de publicación1988-07-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaAmerican Journal of International Law (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0002-9300 • E-ISSN: 2161-7953
EditorialCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2202960
OpenAlexW2322525004
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas2
Referencias citadas6

On October 22, 1981, the Governments of Iceland and Norway approved an agreement for the joint management of the resources of the Jan Mayen continental shelf. Incorporating the recommendations of a three-member conciliation commission, the Agreement obviated the need to draw a line demarcating the right to exploit the nonliving resources in the disputed area. The proliferation of boundary disputes during the intervening 7 years makes this an appropriate time to look at the potential benefits of using this approach in other maritime boundary disputes. After reviewing the stages in the resolution of the Jan Mayen dispute and the terms of the Agreement, this essay will discuss other situations in which the joint development approach has been used, the factors affecting its success and some examples of current delimitation disputes where this approach may be applicable

Arbitration · Boundary (topology · Commission · Computer security · Conciliation · Exploit · International law · Joint (building · Maritime boundary · Perspective (graphical · Political science · Arctic and Russian Policy Studies · Coastal and Marine Management · Computer Science · Engineering · International Maritime Law Issues · Law · Mathematics