The Meaning of “Force” and the Boundaries of the Jus ad Bellum

Are “Minimal” Uses of Force Excluded from UN Charter Article 2(4)

Datos Bibliográficos

ID9560488
AutoresTom Ruys (0000-0002-5605-8557, autor de correspondencia)
Año2014
Volumen108
Número2
Páginas159-210
Fecha de publicación2014-04-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaAmerican Journal of International Law (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0002-9300 • E-ISSN: 2161-7953
EditorialCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.5305/amerjintelaw.108.2.0159
OpenAlexW3125849536
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas11
Referencias citadas23

Are there forcible acts that, because of their small scale or confined purposes, are not covered by the prohibition of the use of force in Article 2(4) of the UN Charter? The argument that there exists a “gravity threshold,” below which the prohibition of the use of force is inapplicable, appears to be gaining ground in legal doctrine. In a similar vein, the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on the Conflict in Georgia stated in its report that the “prohibition of the use of force covers all physical force which surpasses a minimum threshold of intensity” and that “[o]nly very small incidents lie below this threshold, for instance the targeted killing of single individuals, forcible abductions of individual persons, or the interception of a single aircraft.” Other types of acts that have sometimes been characterized as insufficiently “grave” include operations aimed at rescuing nationals abroad, “hot pursuit” operations, small-scale counterterrorist operations abroad, and localized hostile encounters between military units. This article investigates relevant practice and legal statements from many such situations, while adding a number of conceptual observations. It concludes that excluding small-scale or “targeted” forcible acts from the scope of Article 2(4) is conceptually confused, inconsistent with customary practice, and undesirable as a matter of policy

Argument (complex analysis · Charter · Doctrine · Epistemology · Geography · International law · Jus ad bellum · Law and economics · Meaning (existential · Political science · Scale (ratio · Scope (computer science · Sociology · United Nations Charter · Use of force · Computer Science · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Law and Human Rights · Law · Medicine · Philosophy · War, Ethics, and Justification