Democratization, Social Welfare and Individual Rights in Russia
The Case of Old-Age Pensions
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 9640641 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Andrea Chandler (0000-0003-3244-9489, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2001 |
| Volumen | 43 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 409-435 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2001-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Canadian Slavonic Papers (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0008-5006 • E-ISSN: 2375-2475 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00085006.2001.11092288 |
| OpenAlex | W2016924213 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
Russia’s transition to a market economy has been accompanied by serious, and in some ways unanticipated, disruptions of the existing social welfare system. The social policy dilemma has become a contentious issue in the national political arena. This paper examines the debate on the relationship between social welfare and democratization in post-communist Russia, exploring the case of pensions for the elderly. Although the causes of the pension crisis are complex and rooted in institutional difficulties, the state’s fiscal weakness alone does not explain the difficulties and controversies associated with Russia’s pension crisis. Analysis of the assumptions and principles of pension policy during the Soviet era and perestroika reveals that Russia today is caught between contradictory and competing discourses over citizens’ entitlement to pensions: Is an old-age pension to be considered a reward distributed by a prosperous society, or a basic and inviolable human right? Although the Russian government has used an argument that in effect makes pensions conditional on government resources, citizen and opposition protest has to some extent compelled the Russian government to be increasingly sensitive to demands for guaranteed pensions
Argument (complex analysis · Democracy · Democratization · Development economics · Dilemma · Economics · Entitlement (fair division · Government (linguistics · Market economy · Opposition (politics · Pension · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Social policy · Welfare state · Law · Social Policy and Reform Studies
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,09 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2003 - 2015 (13) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 2 |