The New Legal Empiricism & Its Application to Access-to-Justice Inquiries
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 9685782 |
|---|---|
| Autores | D James Greiner (0000-0001-8506-9338, Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2019 |
| Volumen | 148 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 64-74 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2019-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Daedalus (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0011-5266 • E-ISSN: 1548-6192 |
| Editorial | MIT Press - Journals (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1162/daed_a_00536 |
| OpenAlex | W2908127120 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
The United States legal profession routinely deals with evidence in and out of courtrooms, but the profession is not evidence-based in a scientific sense. Lawyers, judges, and court administrators make decisions determining the lives of individuals and families by relying on gut intuition and instinct, not on rigorous evidence. Achieving access to justice requires employing a new legal empiricism. It starts with sharply defined research questions that are truly empirical. Disinterested investigators deploy established techniques chosen to fit the nature of those research questions, following established rules of research ethics and research integrity. New legal empiricists will follow the evidence where it leads, even when that is to unpopular conclusions challenging conventional legal thinking and practice
Economic Justice · Empiricism · Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Instinct · Intuition · Legal Ethics · Legal profession · Political science · Sociology · Law · Legal Education and Practice Innovations · Legal Systems and Judicial Processes · Philosophy
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,67 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 2 |