Science Democratization for Rigor, Relevance, and Resilience
Datos Bibliográficos
Developmental psychobiology and neuroscience hold the promise to improve children's lives but also the peril to entrench marginalization when insights are misapplied or stripped of context. Diversification tilts us towards promise, but as political forces threaten inclusive research practices and public trust in science, developmental researchers face a critical moment. This paper argues that science democratization—grounded in care, inclusivity, and shared authority—can make our science more rigorous, relevant, and resilient. We begin by reviewing how gender, ethnoracial, and cognitive diversity among researchers and participants has expanded the field's reach and sharpened its questions. We then turn to democratization as a relational stance centering care and agency, with the enhancement of our science as a consequence. To ground this approach, we describe an illustrative gender‐inclusion event led by the Community Neuroscience Initiative (CNI), which brought together scientists and community members for dialogue, shared learning, and collaboration. Finally, we offer readings, practical recommendations, and open questions for readers interested in applying these ideas to their own work. Written collaboratively with input from all stakeholders involved, this manuscript offers a timely vision for a more ethical, inclusive, and impactful developmental psychobiology and neuroscience
Democracy · Democratization · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Physics · Political science · Politics · Relevance (law) · Resilience (materials science) · Law · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Psychology · Public Health Policies and Education · Zoonotic diseases and public health
In defence of the value free ideal
Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups
Gender-diverse teams produce more novel and higher-impact scientific ideas
The persistent sampling bias in developmental psychology
Sleep in adolescence
Towards a More Inclusive and Dynamic Understanding of Medical Mistrust Informed by Science
The preeminence of ethnic diversity in scientific collaboration
Benefits of multisensory learning
Writing experiences of neurodiverse students in graduate STEM programs
Challenging the White = Neutral Framework in Psychology
The Committed Objectivity of Science and the Importance of Scientific Knowledge in Ethical and Political Education
Racial Inequality in Psychological Research
Care and Solidarity Are Conditions for Interventionist Research
Broadening Participation in Community Problem Solving
Enabling a just energy transition through solidarity in research
Blinded by neuroscience
What is co-production? Conceptualising and understanding co-production of knowledge and policy across different theoretical perspectives
Evidence-based practice and the ethics of care
Distributive Epistemic Justice in Science
Academia in a time of genocide
Does ethnoracial context diversity predict implicit associations of sexual orientation? Evidence from linked Census Bureau and Implicit Association Test data
Does psychology fail in the face of genocide? Insights about Gaza before and after October 7, 2023
Psychology's Weird Problems
Undone Science
US universities are not succeeding in diversifying faculty
What is participatory research
Solidarity as methodological praxis
Soylent Is People, and Weird Is White
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |