Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

High‐powered Contracts, Self‐selection and Welfare in Settings with Externalities

Datos Bibliográficos

ID9723626
AutoresEberhard Feess (0000-0002-8365-8048, Frankfurt School of Finance & Management), M Vittoria Levati (0000-0002-5416-3759, University of Verona), Marcel Rieser (Frankfurt School of Finance & Management), Ivan Soraperra (0000-0002-4596-3885, University of Amsterdam)
Año2020
Volumen87
Número346
Páginas328-363
Fecha de publicación2020-04-01
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaEconomica (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0013-0427 • E-ISSN: 1468-0335
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/ecca.12320
OpenAlexW2962945271
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas31

We extend the experimental analysis of sorting and effort effects of high‐powered contracts on welfare to situations with negative externalities. Participants solve brainteasers from Raven's matrices. The difference between right and wrong answers represents our measure of welfare per capita. We compare two contract schemes: fixed‐wage and bonus contracts that reward subjects for the number of correct answers, regardless of the number of wrong answers. With fixed wages, selfish individuals have no effort incentive. With bonuses, they have incentives to answer as many questions as possible. The two contract schemes are further separated depending on whether participants self‐select or are randomly assigned to a contract. The self‐selection treatments correspond to cases where countries do not regulate contracts. The random assignment treatments mimic situations where countries either offer only bonuses or ban them. We find that bonuses generate lower welfare per capita than fixed wages as the higher effort incentives are outweighed by the detrimental effect of answering too many questions. However, due to productivity sorting, a general ban on bonuses does not increase welfare per capita compared to offering both contract schemes

Economic growth · Economics · Externality · Incentive · Labour economics · Microeconomics · Per capita · Population · Productivity · Sorting · Wage · Welfare · Culture, Economy, and Development Studies · Economic Policies and Impacts · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies

  • Large Stakes and Big Mistakes

    Dan Ariely, Uri Gneezy et al.•The Review of Economic Studies•2009

  • Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests

    Gary Charne, G Charness et al.•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2002

  • Subject pool recruitment procedures

    Open Access•Ben Greiner•Journal of the Economic Science…•2015

  • Performance Pay and Multidimensional Sorting

    Thomas Dohmen, Aliya Falk et al.•American Economic Review•2011

  • Giving According to Garp

    Open Access•James Andreoni, John H Miller et al.•Econometrica•2002

  • The Hidden Costs of Control

    Aliya Falk, Armin Falk et al.•American Economic Review•2006

  • Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects

    Charles A Holt, Susan K Laury•American Economic Review•2002

  • Z-Tree

    Open Access•Urs Fischbacher•Experimental Economics•2007

  • Individual Risk Attitudes

    Open Access•Thomas Dohmen, Aliya Falk et al.•Journal of the European Economic…•2011

  • Field Experiments with Firms

    Open Access•Oriana Bandiera, Iwan Barankay et al.•The Journal of Economic…•2011

Altamente citadoNo
Abrir DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae