Distributional Effects of Corruption When Enforcement is Biased
Theory and Evidence from Bribery in Schools in Bangladesh
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 9725938 |
|---|---|
| Autores | M Shahe Emran (0000-0002-4375-0958, IPD, Columbia University), Asad Islam (0000-0002-0928-0454, Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute), Asadul Islam (0000-0001-9510-1178, Monash University), Forhad Shilpi (0000-0003-0112-8340, World Bank) |
| Año | 2020 |
| Volumen | 87 |
| Número | 348 |
| Páginas | 985-1015 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2020-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Economica (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0013-0427 • E-ISSN: 1468-0335 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/ecca.12337 |
| OpenAlex | W2786957391 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 3 |
| Referencias citadas | 43 |
In many models of corruption where enforcement is unbiased, the rich are more likely to pay bribes for their children's education, implying that corruption reduces educational inequality. We develop models of bribery that reflect the fact that in developing countries, anticorruption enforcement is not unbiased, and higher income of a household is associated with higher bargaining power and better quality of institutions. In models of biased enforcement, the rich are less likely to pay bribes, making bribery regressive. The OLS estimates of the effects of household income are likely to find spurious progressivity in the incidence of bribery in schools. We exploit temporary rainfall shocks to provide suggestive evidence on the ability‐to‐pay effect, while long‐term rainfall differences capture the combined ‘poor people’ and ‘poor area’ effects. We find that the poor are more likely to pay bribes, and the amount paid does not depend on household income. The evidence rejects the ability‐to‐pay and related models based on unbiased enforcement, and is consistent with the ‘refusal‐to‐pay model’ of bargaining power where the rich decline to pay bribes. ‘Free schooling’ is free only for the rich, and corruption makes the playing field skewed against the poor
Bargaining power · Demographic economics · Developing country · Economic growth · Economics · Enforcement · Exploit · Inequality · Labour economics · Language change · Microeconomics · Public economics · Quality (philosophy) · Spurious relationship · Corruption and Economic Development · Economic Growth and Development · Media Influence and Politics
World Trade Report 2006
Limited information estimators and exogeneity tests for simultaneous probit models
Corruption perceptions vs. corruption reality
Human capital development before age five
Family income, parental education and brain structure in children and adolescents
Building State Capacity
Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression
A model of intergenerational mobility variation over time and place
New Frontiers in Diagnosing and Combating Corruption
Corruption and the costs of redistribution
What Determines Corruption? International Evidence From Microdata
The Inheritance of Educational Inequality
Controlling Corruption
A Theory of Misgovernance
Corruption and Government
Obtaining a Driver's License in India
Corruption
Who Must Pay Bribes and How Much? Evidence from a Cross Section of Firms
Identification and Inference With Many Invalid Instruments
Plausibly Exogenous
Access to Markets and Rural Poverty
Aid and Growth
The Law and Economics of Bribery and Extortion
Is Bribery Really Regressive? Bribery’s Costs, Benefits, and Mechanisms
Gender, Geography, and Generations
How corruption hits people when they are down
The Simple Economics of Extortion
An Equilibrium Theory of the Distribution of Income and Intergenerational Mobility
Monitoring Corruption
Intelligence
Do Police Reduce Crime? Estimates Using the Allocation of Police Forces After a Terrorist Attack
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,75 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2022 - 2025 (4) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 3 |