Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Public Meetings, Respectable Requisitions, and Popular Politics in Great Britain and Ireland, c. 1769–1850

Datos Bibliográficos

ID9737325
AutoresRichard Huzzey (0000-0002-4765-9270, Durham University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2023
Volumen138
Número590-591
Páginas185-221
Fecha de publicación2023-10-13
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaThe English Historical Review (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0013-8266 • E-ISSN: 1477-4534
EditorialOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/ehr/cead006
OpenAlexW4376140400
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas5

This article examines the practice of ‘requisitioning’ public meetings in Great Britain and Ireland. These written requests to office-holders emerged in Ireland and then Great Britain, following bitter contests over the authenticity and authority of addresses and meetings claiming to represent a county or town in the decade after 1769. If the Seditious Meetings Acts privileged meetings officially convened by local elites, they also codified the practice of householders signing their own advertisements to requisition meetings under magisterial oversight. This would, especially when revolutionary threats receded and local justices’ sympathies permitted, allow local organisers some legal and constitutional claims to public assembly, even if Peterloo demonstrated the continuing threat of the Riot Act. Alongside bi-partisan opportunism encouraging public meetings, the article emphasises the creative use of constitutional and legal claims by ‘political entrepreneurs’. Comparison with Ireland demonstrates ministers’ greater recourse to new legislation and executive powers, but also the exchange of political practices with Great Britain. The prosecution of intimidating numbers, rather than seditious conduct, after 1842 diminished the role of requisitions, as did the hybridisation of ‘public meetings’. This was not so much the loss of a demotic form of community deliberation, but a proliferation and multiplication of the meetings—and voices—claiming to represent public opinion. The changing uses of a subscriptional practice can illuminate the relationship between government initiatives and local enforcement, and highlight the talents of those forging new meanings of the law, the constitution, and the political nation from restrictive procedures

Constitution · Deliberation · Government (linguistics · Legislation · Political science · Politics · Sociology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · European Political History Analysis · Historical Economic and Social Studies · Law · Public Administration

  • British Political Culture and the Idea of ‘Public Opinion', 1867–1914

    Open Access•James Thompson, James E Thompson•British Political Culture and the…•2013

  • The Catholic Emancipation Crisis of 1825

    G I T Machin•The English Historical Review•1963

  • Policing Chartism, 1839-1848

    R Swift, Rose J Swift•The English Historical Review•2007

  • Women Against Slavery

    Clare Midgley•Women Against Slavery•2004

  • The Law of Libel and the Limits of Repression, 1790–1832

    Open Access•Philip Harling•The Historical Journal•2001

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae