Borderline Citizens
Women, Gender, and Political Culture in Britain, 1815-1867
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 9740893 |
|---|---|
| Autores | John Prest (autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2010 |
| Volumen | 125 |
| Número | 516 |
| Páginas | 1261-1263 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2010-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | The English Historical Review (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0013-8266 • E-ISSN: 1477-4534 |
| Editorial | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ehr/ceq248 |
| OpenAlex | W2325339691 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 7 |
Studies of women and politics in this period start with the statutory and common-law barriers to their participation. The statutory ones were the male qualification for electors inserted into the 1832 Reform Act for England and Wales and the Municipal Corporations Reform Act of 1835, and the ending of the practice whereby the freemen's franchise could be passed on like a piece of property through a daughter to her husband. There were some statutory opportunities for women to take part in elections through the rate-paying qualifications set up under general Acts relating to the poor law and public health (‘Words importing the Masculine Gender shall include Females’, 11 and 12 Vict. c. 63 s.2), and a trawl through local Acts might reveal more. But not for all, or even for many; the Jus mariti or common-law rule that a wife's property and earnings belonged to her husband stood in the way. Time and again Kathryn Gleadle returns to the point that the women who could take part in politics were those with an income or property of their own, single women—spinsters and widows—together with a minute number of married women whose husbands made money over to them through a trust. That said, we should not underestimate the number of middle-class spinsters living independently, who (inspired perhaps by Harriet Martineau and evangelical perceptions of usefulness) participated in politics by delivering anti-revolutionary and teetotal tracts to working men. Nor, Gleadle suggests, should we overlook widows living in more expansive circumstances who succeeded in carrying on the businesses which had ruined their husbands’ health. But the majority had to wait until the Married Women's Property Act of 1882 gave married women too a right to their own income and property
Business · Daughter · Earnings · Franchise · Lawsuit · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Statutory law · Wife · Gender Studies · Historical Gender and Feminism Studies · Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes · Law
Organizing Democracy
The Public Life of Charlotte Carmichael Stopes
A Glass Half Full'? Women's history in the UK
Granny thinking what she is going to write in her book
Patrice Bouche, Shirley Doulière et Margaret Gillespie (dir.), La place des femmes dans l’espace public, 1800-1939, Grande- Bretagne, Irlande, Empire
Patrice Bouche, Shirley Doulière et Margaret Gillespie, La place des femmes dans l’espace public, 1800-1939, Grande- Bretagne, Irlande, Empire
The Too Clever by Half People’ and Parliament
| Obras citantes distintas | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,78 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2017 - 2022 (6) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 3 |