Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

The trigger mechanism of the target detection task influencing recognition memory at Stimulus Onset Asynchrony of 0.5 s

Evidence from the remember-know paradigm

Datos Bibliográficos

ID9744606
AutoresChenyang Shang (0000-0002-2022-0188, Capital Normal University), Meng Sun (0009-0003-4452-7939, Anhui Medical University), Qin Zhang (0000-0002-7537-9129, Capital Normal University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2025
Volumen33
Número6
Páginas744-755
Fecha de publicación2025-07-03
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaMemory (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0965-8211 • E-ISSN: 1464-0686
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09658211.2025.2504594
PMID40396476
OpenAlexW4410565091
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas32

Individuals showed better memory performance for target-paired items compared to distractor-paired items during sequential target detection and memory encoding tasks, a phenomenon called target-paired memory enhancement (TPME). The TPME was considered to be triggered by the response when the detection stimulus preceded the memory item by 0.5 s without temporal overlap. However, this hypothesis has not been empirically verified. To test the hypothesis, we instructed participants to detect the target colour before memorizing words, varying the response requirements for the target colour across different tasks. Participants responded only to the target colour in the Go-target-0.5 s task (SOA = 0.5 s) and Go-target-1 s task (SOA = 1 s), to distractor colours in the No-Go-target task, and to all colours with different keys in the response-choice task. The results of the remember-know recognition test showed that TPME was consistent across all tasks for R responses, but only occurred in the Go-target-0.5 s task for corrected K responses. These results suggested that both target detection and response can independently contribute to TPME when the detection stimulus and the memory item were presented successively without temporal overlap. The target detection enhanced recollection and familiarity, while the response enhanced familiarity. The effect on recollection was lasting, while the effect on familiarity was transient

Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Cognitive science · Recognition memory · Stimulus onset asynchrony · Computer Science · Face Recognition and Perception · Memory Processes and Influences · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Neuroscience · Psychology

  • The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory.

    Fergus I M Craik, Richard Govoni et al.•Journal of Experimental…•1996

  • The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity

    Open Access•Andrew P Yonelinas•Journal of Memory and Language•2002

  • Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II

    Open Access•Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Jonathon Love et al.•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2018

  • PsychoPy2

    Open Access•Jonathan Peirce, Jonathan W Peirce et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2019

  • Target decision or action?The role of action in the attentional boost effect

    ZHENG Siqi, Yingfang Meng et al.•Acta Psychologica Sinica•2022

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae