Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Imperial entomology

Boris P. Uvarov and locusts, c. 1920– c. 1950

Datos Bibliográficos

ID9778347
AutoresMichael Worboys (0000-0001-8583-7931, University of Manchester, autor de correspondencia)
Año2022
Volumen55
Número1
Páginas27-51
Fecha de publicación2022-03-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaThe British Journal for the History of Science (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0007-0874 • E-ISSN: 1474-001X
EditorialCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0007087421000807
PMID35045907
OpenAlexW4206040968
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas2
Referencias citadas12

In this article, I explore how the twin forces of imperial and entomological power allowed Britain to shape locust research and control across Africa, the Middle East and South Asia from the 1920s to the early 1950s. Imperial power came from the size of the formal and informal empire, and alliances with other colonial powers to tackle a common threat to agriculture and trade. Entomological authority came primarily from the work of Boris Uvarov and his small team of museum and fieldworkers based at the Imperial Bureau of Entomology (IBE), later the Imperial Institute of Entomology (IIE). I begin by discussing how Uvarov's phase theory of the origin of swarming changed the prospects for the control of locust plagues. The imperial gaze and networks of the IBE and IIE were suited to a problem that was transnational and transcontinental. In the 1930s, Britain was drawn into plans for international cooperation on locust organizations that met the needs of science, to give better sharing of knowledge, and the needs for science, to secure the resources for research and control. However, such organizations were only created during the Second World War, when new plagues threatened military operations, as I show in relation to the measures taken to control the red locust and desert locust. In the final section, I follow the fate of the wartime cooperation in initiatives to establish permanent control organizations. It is a story of the decline of British political power in locust affairs as the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization and regional agencies took over. My account of British locust research and control reveals a neglected aspect of histories of entomology and imperial/colonial science, especially their international relations and the continuing importance of metropolitan research centres

Agriculture · China · Colonialism · Desert locust · Locust · Politics · Power (physics · African history and culture studies · Animal and Plant Science Education · Insect and Pesticide Research

  • Isis Current Bibliography of the History of Science and Its Cultural Influence 2023

    James Evans, Tyler Reigeluth et al.•Isis•2023

  • Introduction

    Lisa Onaga, Dominik Huenniger•Isis•2024

  • Nutrition and Health. The International Context During the Inter-war Crisis

    Josep Lluís Barona•Social History of Medicine•2008

  • To Kill the Locusts, But Not Destroy the Farmers’

    Lize-Marié van der Watt•South African Historical Journal•2010

  • On Visiting the 'Moving Metropolis

    R C Macleod, R Macleod•Historical Records of Australian…•1982

  • Editing entomology

    Open Access•Matthew Wale•The British Journal for the…•2019

  • White Ants, Empire, and Entomo-Politics in South Asia

    Open Access•Rohan Deb Roy•The Historical Journal•2019

  • The Evils of Locust Bait

    Jibril Mohamed•Past & Present•2002

Obras citantes distintas2
Citas por año0,67
Intervalo de citas2023 - 2024 (2)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae