Is ‘Empowerment’ the Answer

Current Theory and Research on Development Communication

Datos Bibliográficos

ID9848437
AutoresRobert A White (Gregorian University, Piazza della Pilotta, 400187 Rome, Italy., autor de correspondencia)
Año2004
Volumen66
Número1
Páginas7-24
Fecha de publicación2004-02-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaGazette (Leiden Netherlands (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0016-5492 • E-ISSN: 1460-3594
EditorialSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0016549204039939
OpenAlexW2118950652
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas18
Referencias citadas18

Recent theories of communication for development consider the lack of political, economic and cultural power of lower-status sectors as the central problem to be addressed in development. The majority do not have access to the education, technical assistance, good health and housing needed to make a contribution to national development. A deeper issue are the cultural values which see minorities such as women as not capable of making a contribution. Thus, the new movements seek to ‘empower’ themselves by resignifying the meaning of gender, youth, race, ethnicity and region as key actors in the development process and therefore as worthy of access to resources. Empowerment is central to the process of development, but empowerment, it is argued, needs to be located within a broader framework, which sees the goal of development as the cultural and political acceptance of universal human rights. Power must be seen as a source of social responsibility and service. Movements cannot stop at their own empowerment but must gain the respect for the rights of all in the society

Economic growth · Economics · Empowerment · Ethnic group · Human rights · Meaning (existential · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Public relations · Race (biology · Sociology · Gender Studies · Law · Psychology · Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development