A comparative study of Covid-19 responses in South Korea and Japan
Political nexus triad and policy responses
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 9960596 |
|---|---|
| Autores | M Jae Moon (0000-0002-6499-5700, Yonsei University, Republic of Korea, autor de correspondencia), Kohei Suzuki (0000-0002-5403-4826, Leiden University, The Netherlands), Tae In Park (0000-0002-3485-814X, Seoul National University, Republic of Korea), Kentaro Sakuwa (0000-0002-5921-851X, Aoyama Gakuin University) |
| Año | 2021 |
| Volumen | 87 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 651-671 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2021-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | International Review of Administrative Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0020-8523 • E-ISSN: 1461-7226 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0020852321997552 |
| PMID | 40479109 |
| OpenAlex | W3136070355 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 23 |
| Referencias citadas | 17 |
Korea and Japan, neighboring democratic countries in Northeast Asia, announced their first COVID-19 cases in January 2020 and witnessed similar patterns of disease spread but adopted different policy approaches to address the pandemic (agile and proactive approach versus cautious and restraint-based approach). Applying the political nexus triad model, this study analyzes and compares institutional contexts and governance structures of Korea and Japan, then examines the differences in policy responses of the two Asian countries. This study first reviews the state of COVID-19 and examines changes in the conventional president-led political nexus triad in Korea and the bureaucracy-led political nexus triad in Japan. Then, this study examines how the differences in institutional contexts and governance structures shaped policy responses and policy outcomes of the two countries in managing the COVID-19 crisis
Bureaucracy · Corporate governance · Democracy · Development economics · Economics · Government (linguistics · Management · Nexus (standard · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Triad (sociology · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · COVID-19 epidemiological studies · Disaster Management and Resilience · Public Administration
Policy advisory system quality under multilevel governance
Support and trust in the government and Covid-19 experts during the pandemic
Political orientation and Covid-19 policy preferences during the early pandemic
Why do democracies respond differently to Covid-19? A comparison of the United States and South Korea
Collaborative governance in disaster management and sustainable development
Framing Effects of Emphasis and Form in Emergency Communication
Securing the Pandemic
Varied rather than similar
Job retention opportunities in a pandemic crisis based on the example of three countries in the Asia-Pacific region
State capacity and populist rule in times of uncertainty
Exploring pandemic-specific welfare regimes typology
Critical juncture, learning and state capacity-in-motion
What accounts for the different regional responses to Covid-19 in China? Exploring the role of institutional environment, governance capacity and legitimacy
Trust in Government and Covid-19 Response Policy
Crisis politics of dehumanisation during Covid-19
Authoritarian Backsliding? Public Support for Liberty Restricting Policies During Covid-19
Changes in inter-city car travel behavior over the course of a year during the Covid-19 pandemic
Representation in times of crisis
Stuck Between the Great Powers
Precaution and proportionality in pandemic politics
Governing schools in times of pandemic
Covid-19 pandemic and competitive authoritarian regimes
The role of policy learning in explaining Covid-19 policy changes
A Big Bang for Japanese Mandarins? The Civil Service Reform of 2014
South Korea’s fast response to coronavirus disease
Organizing Leviathan
Policy learning and crisis policy-making
Presidents, Prime Ministers and Politics of Care – Why K orea Expanded Childcare Much More than J apan
Fighting Covid ‐19 with Agility, Transparency, and Participation
Crisis Decision‐Making on a Global Scale
Asian model of government re-examined in the aftermath of the global economic crunch
Shaping Administrative Reform and Governance
Dismantling the "Developmental State"? Administrative Procedure Reform in Japan and Korea
| Obras citantes distintas | 23 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 5,75 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 23 |