Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

David R Topper

Biographic Data

ID1002217
NAMEDavid R Topper
GIVEN NAMESDavid R
FAMILY NAMETopper
SIGNATURETOPPER D R
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS23
TOTAL CITATIONS2
WORKS AS AUTHOR23
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1974
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR1991
H-INDEX1
  • "Comment on "Behaviorism, Causality and Cybernetics

    David Topper, David R Topper•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1991

  • On a Ghost of Historiography past

    David Topper, David R Topper•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1988

    Prompted by a recent debate in this journal over Zeitgeist historiography, the author supports the position of Linda Dalrymple Henderson that only a causal connection between art and science is a valid methodological position. Drawing on some specific historical case studies, the author presents several arguments against Zeitgeist historiography

  • Jacob Bronowski

    David Topper, David R Topper•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1985

  • Interrelationships of the Arts, Sciences and Technology

    David Topper, David R Topper et al.•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1985

    The authors present a supplement to their previous bibliography, published in Leonardo in 1980, which covered texts dealing either explicitly or implicitly with interrelationships between the visual arts, science and technology. The items listed in the supplement are mainly secondary sources from the twentieth century

  • Essays on Art and Ontology

    David Topper, David R Topper et al.•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1983

  • Art in the realist ontology of J. J. Gibson

    Open Access•David Topper, David R Topper•ARTICLE•Synthese•1983•Cited by: 1•References: 2

  • Art and Its Objects

    David Topper, David R Topper et al.•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1982

  • Dr. Frank J. Malina

    Henri Gabriel, Amadou-Mahtar M'Bow et al.•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1982

    Amadou-Mahtar M'Bow, David R. Topper, Robert I. Goler, Lynn Olson, Edward Zajec, Robert C. Morgan, John Fisher, James A. Goldman, Al Hurwitz, Michele Emmer, Dr. Frank J. Malina, Leonardo, Vol. 15, No. 4 (Autumn, 1982), pp. 334-335

  • Models

    David Topper, David R Topper•REVIEW•Leonardo•1981

    1. The Model Muddle: Proposals for an Immodest Realism (1966).- 2. Reduction, Explanation and Ontology (1962).- 3. Models, Metaphysics and the Vagaries of Empiricism (1965).- 4. Metaphysics as Heuristic for Science (1965).- 5. Matter, Action and Interaction (1973).- 6. Towards a Critical Materialism (1971).- 7. The Relation Between Philosophy of Science and History of Science (1977).- 8. Telos and Technique: Models as Modes of Action (1968).- 9. …

  • The Sense of Order

    David Topper, David R Topper•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1981

  • Science within Art. Exh. Cat

    David Topper, David R Topper et al.•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1981

  • The Sense of Order

    David Topper, David R Topper et al.•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1980

  • Interrelationships between the Visual Arts, Science and Technology

    David Topper, David R Topper et al.•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1980

    The authors have prepared a bibliography of texts dealing either explicitly or implicitly with interrelationships between the visual arts, science and technology, but excluding the scientific restoration of art works, the detection of forgeries and the properties and hazards of art materials. The items listed are mainly secondary sources from the 20th century. The authors hope that the bibliography will provide a starting point for a study of thi…

  • Borromini

    David Topper, David R Topper et al.•ARTICLE•Technology and Culture•1980

  • Mirror-Image Confusion

    David Topper, David R Topper•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1979

  • Further Reflections on J. J. Gibson's Hypothesis of Picture Perception

    David Topper, David R Topper•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1979

    more detail his 'ecological' hypothesis of pictorial perception. In a previous article [2] I commented upon some possible flaws in Gibson's hypothesis. Although I believe that, in general, Gibson's hypothesis is one of the more fruitful contemporary analyses of art, his latest formulation still contains, I believe, some problems. 1. Gibson's hypothesis contains at its core the following assumption: the analysis of picture perception should be sep…

  • Jacob Bronowski

    David Topper, David R Topper•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1979

    Many have referred to the late Jacob Bronowski (1908-1974) as a Renaissance man in the 20th century. His research and writings spanned a wide range of subjects that cut across both the sciences and the arts: mathematics, physics, biology, anthropology, history of science, philosophy of science, the visual arts, poetry, literature and drama. He was an Honorary Editorial Advisor to Leonardo, a journal that especially gives attention to the interpla…

  • On Interpreting Pictorial Art

    E H Gombrich, Rudolf Arnheim et al.•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1978

  • The Heritage of Apelles

    David Topper, David R Topper et al.•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1978

  • A Discussion of W. A. Adams' "Leonardo" Article Entitled Problems of Pictorial Perception

    David Topper, David R Topper et al.•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1978

    Either I have totally misunderstood William A. Adams' article [1] or the argument contained in it is completely muddled. Here I shall assume the latter. He begins with an assessment of several well-known hypotheses that have been put forward to explain pictorial perception. He states: 'Philosophically, the question is: What does it mean to say that X represents Y? Empirically, it is: What are the perceptual properties of the display X that lead t…

  • Problems of Pictorial Perception

    David Topper, David R Topper•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1978

  • On Interpreting Pictorial Art

    David Topper, David R Topper•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1977•Cited by: 1

    Using J. J. Gibson’s article The Information Available in Pictures published in Leonardo as a point of departure, the author analyzes three hypotheses of pictorial art: (1) the visual, (2) the symbolic and (3) Gibson’s invariants hypothesis. Through a study of the first two hypotheses (drawing heavily upon evidence from the history of art), the author concludes that neither of them alone is sufficient for explaining the characteristics of picture…

  • The Master of Light

    David Topper, David R Topper et al.•ARTICLE•Technology and Culture•1974

  • Art in the realist ontology of J. J. Gibson

    Open Access•David Topper, David R Topper•ARTICLE•Synthese•1983•Cited by: 1•References: 2

  • On Interpreting Pictorial Art

    David Topper, David R Topper•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1977•Cited by: 1

    Using J. J. Gibson’s article The Information Available in Pictures published in Leonardo as a point of departure, the author analyzes three hypotheses of pictorial art: (1) the visual, (2) the symbolic and (3) Gibson’s invariants hypothesis. Through a study of the first two hypotheses (drawing heavily upon evidence from the history of art), the author concludes that neither of them alone is sufficient for explaining the characteristics of picture…

  • The Master of Light

    David Topper, David R Topper et al.•ARTICLE•Technology and Culture•1974

  • On Interpreting Pictorial Art

    David Topper, David R Topper•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1977•Cited by: 1

    Using J. J. Gibson’s article The Information Available in Pictures published in Leonardo as a point of departure, the author analyzes three hypotheses of pictorial art: (1) the visual, (2) the symbolic and (3) Gibson’s invariants hypothesis. Through a study of the first two hypotheses (drawing heavily upon evidence from the history of art), the author concludes that neither of them alone is sufficient for explaining the characteristics of picture…

  • On Interpreting Pictorial Art

    E H Gombrich, Rudolf Arnheim et al.•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1978

  • The Heritage of Apelles

    David Topper, David R Topper et al.•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1978

  • A Discussion of W. A. Adams' "Leonardo" Article Entitled Problems of Pictorial Perception

    David Topper, David R Topper et al.•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1978

    Either I have totally misunderstood William A. Adams' article [1] or the argument contained in it is completely muddled. Here I shall assume the latter. He begins with an assessment of several well-known hypotheses that have been put forward to explain pictorial perception. He states: 'Philosophically, the question is: What does it mean to say that X represents Y? Empirically, it is: What are the perceptual properties of the display X that lead t…

  • Problems of Pictorial Perception

    David Topper, David R Topper•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1978

  • Mirror-Image Confusion

    David Topper, David R Topper•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1979

  • Further Reflections on J. J. Gibson's Hypothesis of Picture Perception

    David Topper, David R Topper•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1979

    more detail his 'ecological' hypothesis of pictorial perception. In a previous article [2] I commented upon some possible flaws in Gibson's hypothesis. Although I believe that, in general, Gibson's hypothesis is one of the more fruitful contemporary analyses of art, his latest formulation still contains, I believe, some problems. 1. Gibson's hypothesis contains at its core the following assumption: the analysis of picture perception should be sep…

  • Jacob Bronowski

    David Topper, David R Topper•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1979

    Many have referred to the late Jacob Bronowski (1908-1974) as a Renaissance man in the 20th century. His research and writings spanned a wide range of subjects that cut across both the sciences and the arts: mathematics, physics, biology, anthropology, history of science, philosophy of science, the visual arts, poetry, literature and drama. He was an Honorary Editorial Advisor to Leonardo, a journal that especially gives attention to the interpla…

  • The Sense of Order

    David Topper, David R Topper et al.•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1980

  • Interrelationships between the Visual Arts, Science and Technology

    David Topper, David R Topper et al.•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1980

    The authors have prepared a bibliography of texts dealing either explicitly or implicitly with interrelationships between the visual arts, science and technology, but excluding the scientific restoration of art works, the detection of forgeries and the properties and hazards of art materials. The items listed are mainly secondary sources from the 20th century. The authors hope that the bibliography will provide a starting point for a study of thi…

  • Borromini

    David Topper, David R Topper et al.•ARTICLE•Technology and Culture•1980

  • Models

    David Topper, David R Topper•REVIEW•Leonardo•1981

    1. The Model Muddle: Proposals for an Immodest Realism (1966).- 2. Reduction, Explanation and Ontology (1962).- 3. Models, Metaphysics and the Vagaries of Empiricism (1965).- 4. Metaphysics as Heuristic for Science (1965).- 5. Matter, Action and Interaction (1973).- 6. Towards a Critical Materialism (1971).- 7. The Relation Between Philosophy of Science and History of Science (1977).- 8. Telos and Technique: Models as Modes of Action (1968).- 9. …

  • The Sense of Order

    David Topper, David R Topper•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1981

  • Science within Art. Exh. Cat

    David Topper, David R Topper et al.•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1981

  • Art and Its Objects

    David Topper, David R Topper et al.•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1982

  • Dr. Frank J. Malina

    Henri Gabriel, Amadou-Mahtar M'Bow et al.•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1982

    Amadou-Mahtar M'Bow, David R. Topper, Robert I. Goler, Lynn Olson, Edward Zajec, Robert C. Morgan, John Fisher, James A. Goldman, Al Hurwitz, Michele Emmer, Dr. Frank J. Malina, Leonardo, Vol. 15, No. 4 (Autumn, 1982), pp. 334-335

  • Essays on Art and Ontology

    David Topper, David R Topper et al.•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1983

  • Art in the realist ontology of J. J. Gibson

    Open Access•David Topper, David R Topper•ARTICLE•Synthese•1983•Cited by: 1•References: 2

  • Jacob Bronowski

    David Topper, David R Topper•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1985

  • Interrelationships of the Arts, Sciences and Technology

    David Topper, David R Topper et al.•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1985

    The authors present a supplement to their previous bibliography, published in Leonardo in 1980, which covered texts dealing either explicitly or implicitly with interrelationships between the visual arts, science and technology. The items listed in the supplement are mainly secondary sources from the twentieth century

  • On a Ghost of Historiography past

    David Topper, David R Topper•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1988

    Prompted by a recent debate in this journal over Zeitgeist historiography, the author supports the position of Linda Dalrymple Henderson that only a causal connection between art and science is a valid methodological position. Drawing on some specific historical case studies, the author presents several arguments against Zeitgeist historiography

  • "Comment on "Behaviorism, Causality and Cybernetics

    David Topper, David R Topper•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1991

Art (17 works) · Visual arts (12 works) · Epistemology (10 works) · Philosophy (10 works) · Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (8 works) · Computer Science (8 works) · Psychology (8 works) · Art history (5 works) · Cognitive science (5 works) · Archaeology (3 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae