Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Thomas Nadelhoffer

Biographic Data

ID1003565
NAMEThomas Nadelhoffer
GIVEN NAMESThomas
FAMILY NAMENadelhoffer
SIGNATURENADELHOFFER T
AFFILIATIONSCollege of Charleston
ORCID0000-0001-8038-7177
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS18
TOTAL CITATIONS24
AUTHOR COUNT18
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2005
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2026
H-INDEX2
  • Thinking differently: Neurodivergent traits and responses to thought experiments in philosophers and the general population

    Paul Mckee, Khaoula Boulhadi et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophical Psychology•2026

    Philosophers have long speculated that individual differences in temperament influence philosophical thinking, yet empirical research has rarely explored the role of neurodivergent traits in this domain. In this large online study (N = 1,254), we investigated whether participants with training in philosophy differ from the general population when it comes to six psychological traits—autism, ADHD, aphantasia, anendophasia, anauralia, and represent…

  • Not What I Expected! Feeling of Surprise Differentially Mediates Effect of Personal Control on Attributions of Free will and Responsibility

    Open Access•Murray, Thomas Nadelhoffer•ARTICLE•Review of Philosophy and Psychology•2024

  • Commonsense morality and the bearable automaticity of being

    Open Access•Murray, Thomas Nadelhoffer•ARTICLE•Consciousness and Cognition•2024

    Some research suggests that moral behavior can be strongly influenced by trivial features of the environment of which we are completely unaware. Philosophers, psychologists, and neuroscientists have argued that these findings undermine our commonsense notions of agency and responsibility, both of which emphasize the role of practical reasoning and conscious deliberation in action. We present the results of four vignette-based studies (N=1,437) de…

  • Intuitions About Free Will and the Failure to Comprehend Determinism

    Open Access•Thomas Nadelhoffer, Murray et al.•ARTICLE•Erkenntnis•2023

  • Chronic Pain, Mere-Differences, and Disability Variantism

    Thomas Nadelhoffer•ARTICLE•The Journal of Philosophy of…•2022

    While some philosophers believe disabilities constitute a “bad-difference,” others think they constitute a “mere-difference” (Barnes 2016). On this latter view, while disabilities may create certain hardships, having a disability is not bad in itself. I argue that chronic pain problematizes this disability-neutral view. In doing so, I first survey the literature on chronic pain (§1). Then, I argue that Barnes’s mere-difference view cannot adequat…

  • Folk psychology and proximal intentions

    Alfred R Mele, Alfred Mele et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophical Psychology•2021

    There is a longstanding debate in philosophy concerning the relationship between intention and intentional action. According to the Single Phenomenon View, while one need not intend to A in order to A intentionally, one nevertheless needs to have an A-relevant intention. This view has recently come under criticism by those who think that one can A intentionally without any relevant intention at all. On this view, neither distal nor proximal inten…

  • Piercing the Smoke Screen: Dualism, Free Will, and Christianity

    Murray, Elise D Murray et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Cognition and Culture•2021•References: 3

    Research on the folk psychology of free will suggests that people believe free will is incompatible with determinism and that human decision-making cannot be exhaustively characterized by physical processes. Some suggest that certain elements of Western cultural history, especially Christianity, have helped to entrench these beliefs in the folk conceptual economy. Thus, on the basis of this explanation, one should expect to find three things: (1)…

  • Folk intuitions and the conditional ability to do otherwise

    Thomas Nadelhoffer, Siyuan Yin et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophical Psychology•2020

    In a series of pre-registered studies, we explored (a) the difference between people’s intuitions about indeterministic scenarios and their intuitions about deterministic scenarios, (b) the difference between people’s intuitions about indeterministic scenarios and their intuitions about neurodeterministic scenarios (that is, scenarios where the determinism is described at the neurological level), (c) the difference between people’s intuitions abo…

  • Does encouraging a belief in determinism increase cheating? Reconsidering the value of believing in free will

    Open Access•Thomas Nadelhoffer, Jason Shepard et al.•ARTICLE•Cognition•2020

  • Be it ever so humble: Proposing a dual-dimension account and measurement of humility

    J C Wright, Thomas Nadelhoffer et al.•ARTICLE•Self and Identity•2017

    What does it mean to be humble? We argue that humility is an epistemically and ethically aligned state of awareness – the experience of ourselves as a small part of a larger universe and as one among a host of other morally relevant beings. So conceived, humility can be operationalized and measured along the dual dimensions of low self-focus and high other-focus and is distinct from other related constructs (e.g., modesty and open-mindedness). We…

  • Pure Retributivism and the Problem of Psychopathy: A Preliminary Investigation / Retributivismo Puro e o Problema da Psicopatia: Uma Investigação Preliminar

    Open Access•Thomas Nadelhoffer•ARTICLE•Revista Direito Estado e Sociedade•2016•References: 1

    My present goal is to explore some possible responses pure (or strict) retributivists might have to the gathering of empirical data on psychopaths. In addressing this issue, I will first briefly examine the strides researchers have recently made in understanding the nature of psychopathy, paying particular attention to work on the neural and genetic components of the disorder (§1). Then, I will survey several ways that a pure retributivist might …

  • The free will inventory: Measuring beliefs about agency and responsibility

    Open Access•Thomas Nadelhoffer, Jason Shepard et al.•ARTICLE•Consciousness and Cognition•2014

  • The Future of Punishment

    Thomas Nadelhoffer, Thomas A Nadelhoffer•BOOK•The future of punishment•2013

    The twelve essays in this volume aim at providing philosophers neuroscientists, psychologists, and legal theorists with an opportunity to examine the cluster of related issues that will need to be addressed as scholars struggle to come to grips with the picture of human agency being pieced together by researchers in the biosciences

  • Neurolaw and Neuroprediction: Potential Promises and Perils

    Open Access•Thomas Nadelhoffer, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophy Compass•2012•References: 61

    Neuroscience has been proposed for use in the legal system for purposes of mind reading, assessment of responsibility, and prediction of misconduct. Each of these uses has both promises and perils, and each raises issues regarding the admissibility of neuroscientific evidence

  • Temperament and intuition: A commentary on Feltz and Cokely

    Open Access•Thomas Nadelhoffer, Trevor Kvaran et al.•ARTICLE•Consciousness and Cognition•2009

  • Desire, Foresight, Intentions, and Intentional Actions: Probing Folk Intuitions

    Thomas Nadelhoffer•ARTICLE•Journal of Cognition and Culture•2006•Cited by: 4

    A number of philosophers working under the rubric of "experimental philosophy" have recently begun focusing on analyzing the concepts of ordinary language and investigating the intuitions of laypersons in an empirically informed way. In a series of papers these philosophers – who often work in collaboration with psychologists – have presented the results of empirical studies aimed at proving folk intuitions in areas as diverse as ethics, epistemo…

  • Is Incompatibilism Intuitive

    Open Access•Eddy Nahmias, Stephen G Morris et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2006•Cited by: 20•References: 6

    Incompatibilists believe free will is impossible if determinism is true, and they often claim that this view is supported by ordinary intuitions. We challenge the claim that incompatibilism is intuitive to most laypersons and discuss the significance of this challenge to the free will debate. After explaining why incompatibilists should want their view to accord with pretheoretical intuitions, we suggest that determining whether incompatibilism i…

  • Surveying Freedom: Folk Intuitions about free will and moral responsibility

    Eddy Nahmias, Stephen Morris et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophical Psychology•2005

    Philosophers working in the nascent field of ‘experimental philosophy’ have begun using methods borrowed from psychology to collect data about folk intuitions concerning debates ranging from action theory to ethics to epistemology. In this paper we present the results of our attempts to apply this approach to the free will debate, in which philosophers on opposing sides claim that their view best accounts for and accords with folk intuitions. Aft…

  • Is Incompatibilism Intuitive

    Open Access•Eddy Nahmias, Stephen G Morris et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2006•Cited by: 20•References: 6

    Incompatibilists believe free will is impossible if determinism is true, and they often claim that this view is supported by ordinary intuitions. We challenge the claim that incompatibilism is intuitive to most laypersons and discuss the significance of this challenge to the free will debate. After explaining why incompatibilists should want their view to accord with pretheoretical intuitions, we suggest that determining whether incompatibilism i…

  • Desire, Foresight, Intentions, and Intentional Actions: Probing Folk Intuitions

    Thomas Nadelhoffer•ARTICLE•Journal of Cognition and Culture•2006•Cited by: 4

    A number of philosophers working under the rubric of "experimental philosophy" have recently begun focusing on analyzing the concepts of ordinary language and investigating the intuitions of laypersons in an empirically informed way. In a series of papers these philosophers – who often work in collaboration with psychologists – have presented the results of empirical studies aimed at proving folk intuitions in areas as diverse as ethics, epistemo…

  • Surveying Freedom: Folk Intuitions about free will and moral responsibility

    Eddy Nahmias, Stephen Morris et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophical Psychology•2005

    Philosophers working in the nascent field of ‘experimental philosophy’ have begun using methods borrowed from psychology to collect data about folk intuitions concerning debates ranging from action theory to ethics to epistemology. In this paper we present the results of our attempts to apply this approach to the free will debate, in which philosophers on opposing sides claim that their view best accounts for and accords with folk intuitions. Aft…

  • Desire, Foresight, Intentions, and Intentional Actions: Probing Folk Intuitions

    Thomas Nadelhoffer•ARTICLE•Journal of Cognition and Culture•2006•Cited by: 4

    A number of philosophers working under the rubric of "experimental philosophy" have recently begun focusing on analyzing the concepts of ordinary language and investigating the intuitions of laypersons in an empirically informed way. In a series of papers these philosophers – who often work in collaboration with psychologists – have presented the results of empirical studies aimed at proving folk intuitions in areas as diverse as ethics, epistemo…

  • Is Incompatibilism Intuitive

    Open Access•Eddy Nahmias, Stephen G Morris et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2006•Cited by: 20•References: 6

    Incompatibilists believe free will is impossible if determinism is true, and they often claim that this view is supported by ordinary intuitions. We challenge the claim that incompatibilism is intuitive to most laypersons and discuss the significance of this challenge to the free will debate. After explaining why incompatibilists should want their view to accord with pretheoretical intuitions, we suggest that determining whether incompatibilism i…

  • Temperament and intuition: A commentary on Feltz and Cokely

    Open Access•Thomas Nadelhoffer, Trevor Kvaran et al.•ARTICLE•Consciousness and Cognition•2009

  • Neurolaw and Neuroprediction: Potential Promises and Perils

    Open Access•Thomas Nadelhoffer, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophy Compass•2012•References: 61

    Neuroscience has been proposed for use in the legal system for purposes of mind reading, assessment of responsibility, and prediction of misconduct. Each of these uses has both promises and perils, and each raises issues regarding the admissibility of neuroscientific evidence

  • The Future of Punishment

    Thomas Nadelhoffer, Thomas A Nadelhoffer•BOOK•The future of punishment•2013

    The twelve essays in this volume aim at providing philosophers neuroscientists, psychologists, and legal theorists with an opportunity to examine the cluster of related issues that will need to be addressed as scholars struggle to come to grips with the picture of human agency being pieced together by researchers in the biosciences

  • The free will inventory: Measuring beliefs about agency and responsibility

    Open Access•Thomas Nadelhoffer, Jason Shepard et al.•ARTICLE•Consciousness and Cognition•2014

  • Pure Retributivism and the Problem of Psychopathy: A Preliminary Investigation / Retributivismo Puro e o Problema da Psicopatia: Uma Investigação Preliminar

    Open Access•Thomas Nadelhoffer•ARTICLE•Revista Direito Estado e Sociedade•2016•References: 1

    My present goal is to explore some possible responses pure (or strict) retributivists might have to the gathering of empirical data on psychopaths. In addressing this issue, I will first briefly examine the strides researchers have recently made in understanding the nature of psychopathy, paying particular attention to work on the neural and genetic components of the disorder (§1). Then, I will survey several ways that a pure retributivist might …

  • Be it ever so humble: Proposing a dual-dimension account and measurement of humility

    J C Wright, Thomas Nadelhoffer et al.•ARTICLE•Self and Identity•2017

    What does it mean to be humble? We argue that humility is an epistemically and ethically aligned state of awareness – the experience of ourselves as a small part of a larger universe and as one among a host of other morally relevant beings. So conceived, humility can be operationalized and measured along the dual dimensions of low self-focus and high other-focus and is distinct from other related constructs (e.g., modesty and open-mindedness). We…

  • Folk intuitions and the conditional ability to do otherwise

    Thomas Nadelhoffer, Siyuan Yin et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophical Psychology•2020

    In a series of pre-registered studies, we explored (a) the difference between people’s intuitions about indeterministic scenarios and their intuitions about deterministic scenarios, (b) the difference between people’s intuitions about indeterministic scenarios and their intuitions about neurodeterministic scenarios (that is, scenarios where the determinism is described at the neurological level), (c) the difference between people’s intuitions abo…

  • Does encouraging a belief in determinism increase cheating? Reconsidering the value of believing in free will

    Open Access•Thomas Nadelhoffer, Jason Shepard et al.•ARTICLE•Cognition•2020

  • Folk psychology and proximal intentions

    Alfred R Mele, Alfred Mele et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophical Psychology•2021

    There is a longstanding debate in philosophy concerning the relationship between intention and intentional action. According to the Single Phenomenon View, while one need not intend to A in order to A intentionally, one nevertheless needs to have an A-relevant intention. This view has recently come under criticism by those who think that one can A intentionally without any relevant intention at all. On this view, neither distal nor proximal inten…

  • Piercing the Smoke Screen: Dualism, Free Will, and Christianity

    Murray, Elise D Murray et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Cognition and Culture•2021•References: 3

    Research on the folk psychology of free will suggests that people believe free will is incompatible with determinism and that human decision-making cannot be exhaustively characterized by physical processes. Some suggest that certain elements of Western cultural history, especially Christianity, have helped to entrench these beliefs in the folk conceptual economy. Thus, on the basis of this explanation, one should expect to find three things: (1)…

  • Chronic Pain, Mere-Differences, and Disability Variantism

    Thomas Nadelhoffer•ARTICLE•The Journal of Philosophy of…•2022

    While some philosophers believe disabilities constitute a “bad-difference,” others think they constitute a “mere-difference” (Barnes 2016). On this latter view, while disabilities may create certain hardships, having a disability is not bad in itself. I argue that chronic pain problematizes this disability-neutral view. In doing so, I first survey the literature on chronic pain (§1). Then, I argue that Barnes’s mere-difference view cannot adequat…

  • Intuitions About Free Will and the Failure to Comprehend Determinism

    Open Access•Thomas Nadelhoffer, Murray et al.•ARTICLE•Erkenntnis•2023

  • Not What I Expected! Feeling of Surprise Differentially Mediates Effect of Personal Control on Attributions of Free will and Responsibility

    Open Access•Murray, Thomas Nadelhoffer•ARTICLE•Review of Philosophy and Psychology•2024

  • Commonsense morality and the bearable automaticity of being

    Open Access•Murray, Thomas Nadelhoffer•ARTICLE•Consciousness and Cognition•2024

    Some research suggests that moral behavior can be strongly influenced by trivial features of the environment of which we are completely unaware. Philosophers, psychologists, and neuroscientists have argued that these findings undermine our commonsense notions of agency and responsibility, both of which emphasize the role of practical reasoning and conscious deliberation in action. We present the results of four vignette-based studies (N=1,437) de…

  • Thinking differently: Neurodivergent traits and responses to thought experiments in philosophers and the general population

    Paul Mckee, Khaoula Boulhadi et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophical Psychology•2026

    Philosophers have long speculated that individual differences in temperament influence philosophical thinking, yet empirical research has rarely explored the role of neurodivergent traits in this domain. In this large online study (N = 1,254), we investigated whether participants with training in philosophy differ from the general population when it comes to six psychological traits—autism, ADHD, aphantasia, anendophasia, anauralia, and represent…

Psychology (17 works) · Epistemology (16 works) · Philosophy (13 works) · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (13 works) · Free Will and Agency (12 works) · Social Psychology (8 works) · Free will (7 works) · Determinism (5 works) · Experimental philosophy (5 works) · Philosophy (5 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae