Danielle Pollock

Biographic Data

ID10135935
NAMEDanielle Pollock
GIVEN NAMESDanielle
FAMILY NAMEPollock
SIGNATUREPOLLOCK D
AFFILIATIONSThe University of Adelaide
ORCID0000-0003-3542-149X
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS6
TOTAL CITATIONS0
AUTHOR COUNT6
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2020
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2023
H-INDEX0

  • Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews

    Donald Pollock, Danielle Pollock et al.ARTICLEJBI Evidence Synthesis2023

    Scoping reviewers often face challenges in the extraction, analysis, and presentation of scoping review results. Using best-practice examples and drawing on the expertise of the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group and an editor of a journal that publishes scoping reviews, this paper expands on existing JBI scoping review guidance. The aim of this article is to clarify the process of extracting data from different sources of evidence; discuss wha…

  • Scoping review of nature-based interventions in bereavement care: What are the implications for perinatal loss

    Open AccessJulie Dean, Andrew Cleary et al.ARTICLESocial Sciences & Humanities Open2023

    Perinatal bereavement, the death of a baby before or around the time of birth, is profoundly distressing and associated with significant psychosocial consequences for parents and families. There is a need for diverse support options for bereaved parents that recognises their continuum of needs, preferences and circumstances. Nature-based interventions have potential as a non-clinical approach drawing on “natural assets” within everyday settings. …

  • What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis

    Zachary Munn, Donald Pollock et al.ARTICLEJBI Evidence Synthesis2022

    Evidence synthesis encompasses a broad range of review types, and scoping reviews are an increasingly popular approach to synthesizing evidence in a number of fields. They sit alongside other evidence synthesis methodologies, such as systematic reviews, qualitative evidence synthesis, realist synthesis, and many more. Until now, scoping reviews have been variously defined in the literature. In this article, we provide the following formal definit…

  • Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols

    Micah D J Peters, Christina Godfrey et al.ARTICLEJBI Evidence Synthesis2022

  • What if academic publishing worked like fan publishing? Imagining the Fantasy Research Archive of Our Own

    Open AccessNele Noppe, Ludi Price et al.ARTICLETransformative Works and Cultures2022

    Researchers, universities, and academic libraries develop a range of tools and platforms to make scholarship more accessible. What could these scholarly communications and open access projects learn from examples set by fandom and fan activists, for example, the fan works platform Archive of Our Own (AO3)? This conceptual paper, the result of a brainstorming session by scholars and librarians, proposes that a Fantasy Research Archive of Our Own s…

  • Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews

    Micah D J Peters, Casey Marnie et al.ARTICLEJBI Evidence Synthesis2020