Melissa E Murray
Dados Biográficos
| ID | 10200070 |
|---|---|
| NOME | Melissa E Murray |
| PRENOMES | Melissa E |
| SOBRENOME | Murray |
| ASSINATURA | MURRAY M E |
| AFILIAÇÕES | New York Law School |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-7379-2545 |
| VERIFICADO | Sim |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 3 |
| TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES | 0 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 3 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2023 |
| ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2023 |
| ÍNDICE H | 0 |
Constitutionalizing Reproductive Rights (and Justice)
In Griswold v. Connecticut and Roe v. Wade, the U.S. Supreme Court framed constitutional protections for reproductive rights around the right to privacy. But the Court’s emphasis on privacy was not inevitable. Rather, in the 1960s and 1970s, advocates challenging laws prohibiting contraception and abortion offered a wide range of constitutional grounds in which to root reproductive freedom, including claims of race, class, and sex inequality. Nev…
Equal Protection in Dobbs and Beyond
In two paragraphs at the beginning of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the Supreme Court rejected the Equal Protection Clause as an alternative ground for the abortion right. As the parties had not asserted an equal protection claim on which the Court could rule, Justice Alito cited an amicus brief we co-authored demonstrating that Mississippi’s abortion ban violated the Equal Protection Clause, and, in dicta, stated that precedents …
Mothers in Law
A Review of Civil Rights Queen: Constance Baker Motley and the Struggle for Equality. By Tomiko Brown-Nagin
Sem obras proeminentes nesta página.
Constitutionalizing Reproductive Rights (and Justice)
In Griswold v. Connecticut and Roe v. Wade, the U.S. Supreme Court framed constitutional protections for reproductive rights around the right to privacy. But the Court’s emphasis on privacy was not inevitable. Rather, in the 1960s and 1970s, advocates challenging laws prohibiting contraception and abortion offered a wide range of constitutional grounds in which to root reproductive freedom, including claims of race, class, and sex inequality. Nev…
Equal Protection in Dobbs and Beyond
In two paragraphs at the beginning of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the Supreme Court rejected the Equal Protection Clause as an alternative ground for the abortion right. As the parties had not asserted an equal protection claim on which the Court could rule, Justice Alito cited an amicus brief we co-authored demonstrating that Mississippi’s abortion ban violated the Equal Protection Clause, and, in dicta, stated that precedents …
Mothers in Law
A Review of Civil Rights Queen: Constance Baker Motley and the Struggle for Equality. By Tomiko Brown-Nagin
Law (3 obras) · Political science (3 obras) · Abortion (2 obras) · American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 obras) · Economic Justice (2 obras) · Feminist Theory and Gender Studies (2 obras) · Sociology (2 obras) · Supreme court (2 obras) · Biology (1 obras) · Due Process Clause (1 obras)