Megan A Allyse
Biographic Data
| ID | 102569 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Megan A Allyse |
| GIVEN NAMES | Megan A |
| FAMILY NAME | Allyse |
| SIGNATURE | ALLYSE M A |
| AFFILIATIONS | Mayo Clinic in Florida |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-6136-9256 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 19 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 1 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 18 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 1 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2016 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Trust As the Foundation for Informed Decision‐Making in Prenatal Genetic Screening and Diagnostic Testing: A Qualitative Study
The Disproportionate Impact of Structural and Cultural Factors on Covid-19 Outcomes in Hispanic Populations: A Mixed-Methods Study
The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated health disparities, disproportionately impacting Hispanic populations. Structural inequities, unfavorable social determinants of health (SDOH), and sociocultural values have all been found to be associated with higher COVID-19 transmission rates. To explore this further, we conducted a community-engaged, mixed methods study to examine how these factors influenced adherence to COVID-19 guidelines. Data was collect…
Struggles, Strength, and Aspirations: Voices of Healthcare Workers in a Major Hospital System
Rethinking the Burden of Traditional Informed Consent Prior to Prenatal Genetic Screening
The ethics literature and professional guidelines call for extensive discussions prior to prescreening consent to prenatal cell‐free DNA screening to, theoretically, allow patients to make decisions that match their values and goals of care. Most patients, however, actively avoid in‐depth moral deliberation when consenting to prenatal screening and then receive a screen‐negative result, suggesting that an information‐heavy process is irrelevant f…
The “Strong Black Woman” Paradox: Insights from a Cohort of Black Breast and Ovarian Cancer Patients and Family Members
Through the eyes of Spanish-speaking patients, caregivers, and community leaders: A qualitative study on the in-patient hospital experience
The study showed that in-person interpreters were preferred to virtual interpreters; yet interpreter access was suboptimal. This resulted in ad hoc family interpretation. Participants noted language negatively impacted patient's hospital experience, including decreasing confidence in medical decision-making. Recommendations from patients, caregivers, and community leaders included expanding interpreter access, bolstering interpreter quality and a…
Age-Specific Barriers and Facilitators to Research Participation Amongst African Americans in Observational Studies of Memory and Aging
Cancer Screening Experiences of Black Breast and Ovarian Cancer Patients and Family Members
Born Well: Prenatal Genetics and the Future of Having Children
Pregnant and Postpartum Patients’ Views of Covid-19 Vaccination
Perceptions of Ethnoracial Factors in the Management and Treatment of Uterine Fibroids
Experiences of individuals receiving a sex chromosome multisomy diagnosis
Acknowledging and Addressing Allostatic Load in Pregnancy Care
Where Will We Draw the Line? Public Opinions of Human Gene Editing
The application of gene editing technologies to prevent or mitigate genetic disease in humans is considered one of its most promising applications. However, as the technology advances, it is imperative to understand the views of the broader public on how it should be used. We conducted focus groups to understand public views on the ethical permissibility and governance of gene editing technologies in humans. A total of 50 urban and semirural resi…
Toward an Ethically Sensitive Implementation of Noninvasive Prenatal Screening in the Global Context
Noninvasive prenatal screening using cell‐free DNA, which analyzes placental DNA circulating in maternal blood to provide information about fetal chromosomal disorders early in pregnancy and without risk to the fetus, has been hailed as a potential “paradigm shift” in prenatal genetic screening. Commercial provision of cell‐free DNA screening has contributed to a rapid expansion of the tests included in the screening panels. The tests can include…
The Case of Dr. Oz: Ethics, Evidence, and Does Professional Self-Regulation Work
Dr. Mehmet Oz is widely known not just as a successful media personality donning the title "America's Doctor ® ," but, we suggest, also as a physician visibly out of step with his profession. A recent, unsuccessful attempt to censure Dr. Oz raises the issue of whether the medical profession can effectively self-regulate at all. It also raises concern that the medical profession's self-regulation might be selectively activated, perhaps only when t…
Experiences of Mandarin-speaking and English-speaking women of undergoing non-invasive prenatal genetic screening
Informed decision-making about prenatal cfDNA screening: An assessment of written materials
“I think we’ve got too many tests!”: Prenatal providers’ reflections on ethical and clinical challenges in the practice integration of cell-free DNA screening
Where Will We Draw the Line? Public Opinions of Human Gene Editing
The application of gene editing technologies to prevent or mitigate genetic disease in humans is considered one of its most promising applications. However, as the technology advances, it is imperative to understand the views of the broader public on how it should be used. We conducted focus groups to understand public views on the ethical permissibility and governance of gene editing technologies in humans. A total of 50 urban and semirural resi…
Experiences of Mandarin-speaking and English-speaking women of undergoing non-invasive prenatal genetic screening
Informed decision-making about prenatal cfDNA screening: An assessment of written materials
“I think we’ve got too many tests!”: Prenatal providers’ reflections on ethical and clinical challenges in the practice integration of cell-free DNA screening
Toward an Ethically Sensitive Implementation of Noninvasive Prenatal Screening in the Global Context
Noninvasive prenatal screening using cell‐free DNA, which analyzes placental DNA circulating in maternal blood to provide information about fetal chromosomal disorders early in pregnancy and without risk to the fetus, has been hailed as a potential “paradigm shift” in prenatal genetic screening. Commercial provision of cell‐free DNA screening has contributed to a rapid expansion of the tests included in the screening panels. The tests can include…
The Case of Dr. Oz: Ethics, Evidence, and Does Professional Self-Regulation Work
Dr. Mehmet Oz is widely known not just as a successful media personality donning the title "America's Doctor ® ," but, we suggest, also as a physician visibly out of step with his profession. A recent, unsuccessful attempt to censure Dr. Oz raises the issue of whether the medical profession can effectively self-regulate at all. It also raises concern that the medical profession's self-regulation might be selectively activated, perhaps only when t…
Where Will We Draw the Line? Public Opinions of Human Gene Editing
The application of gene editing technologies to prevent or mitigate genetic disease in humans is considered one of its most promising applications. However, as the technology advances, it is imperative to understand the views of the broader public on how it should be used. We conducted focus groups to understand public views on the ethical permissibility and governance of gene editing technologies in humans. A total of 50 urban and semirural resi…
Acknowledging and Addressing Allostatic Load in Pregnancy Care
Born Well: Prenatal Genetics and the Future of Having Children
Pregnant and Postpartum Patients’ Views of Covid-19 Vaccination
Perceptions of Ethnoracial Factors in the Management and Treatment of Uterine Fibroids
Experiences of individuals receiving a sex chromosome multisomy diagnosis
Cancer Screening Experiences of Black Breast and Ovarian Cancer Patients and Family Members
Through the eyes of Spanish-speaking patients, caregivers, and community leaders: A qualitative study on the in-patient hospital experience
The study showed that in-person interpreters were preferred to virtual interpreters; yet interpreter access was suboptimal. This resulted in ad hoc family interpretation. Participants noted language negatively impacted patient's hospital experience, including decreasing confidence in medical decision-making. Recommendations from patients, caregivers, and community leaders included expanding interpreter access, bolstering interpreter quality and a…
Age-Specific Barriers and Facilitators to Research Participation Amongst African Americans in Observational Studies of Memory and Aging
Rethinking the Burden of Traditional Informed Consent Prior to Prenatal Genetic Screening
The ethics literature and professional guidelines call for extensive discussions prior to prescreening consent to prenatal cell‐free DNA screening to, theoretically, allow patients to make decisions that match their values and goals of care. Most patients, however, actively avoid in‐depth moral deliberation when consenting to prenatal screening and then receive a screen‐negative result, suggesting that an information‐heavy process is irrelevant f…
The “Strong Black Woman” Paradox: Insights from a Cohort of Black Breast and Ovarian Cancer Patients and Family Members
Trust As the Foundation for Informed Decision‐Making in Prenatal Genetic Screening and Diagnostic Testing: A Qualitative Study
The Disproportionate Impact of Structural and Cultural Factors on Covid-19 Outcomes in Hispanic Populations: A Mixed-Methods Study
The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated health disparities, disproportionately impacting Hispanic populations. Structural inequities, unfavorable social determinants of health (SDOH), and sociocultural values have all been found to be associated with higher COVID-19 transmission rates. To explore this further, we conducted a community-engaged, mixed methods study to examine how these factors influenced adherence to COVID-19 guidelines. Data was collect…
Struggles, Strength, and Aspirations: Voices of Healthcare Workers in a Major Hospital System
Medicine (15 works) · Family medicine (9 works) · Psychology (9 works) · Political science (7 works) · Public health (7 works) · Pregnancy (6 works) · Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (6 works) · BRCA gene mutations in cancer (5 works) · Health care (5 works) · Nursing (5 works)