Marion H E Kavanaugh-Lynch
Biographic Data
| ID | 10404064 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Marion H E Kavanaugh-Lynch |
| GIVEN NAMES | Marion H E |
| FAMILY NAME | Kavanaugh-Lynch |
| SIGNATURE | KAVANAUGH-LYNCH M H E |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of California Office of the President |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-9568-5684 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 8 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 9 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 8 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1988 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Searching beyond the Lamppost to Reduce Breast Cancer Disparities
Racial and ethnic differences in breast cancer occur by race/ethnicity in both incidence and mortality rates. Women of lower socioeconomic status likewise have poorer outcomes. When race alone is considered, incidence rates in the United States are highest among White women (130.8 per 100,000), with Black women close behind (126.7 per 100,000). Incidence is lowest among Asian/Pacific Islander women, at 93.2 per 100,000. Mortality differences are …
Californians Linking Action with Science for Prevention of Breast Cancer (CLASP-BC)—Phase 2
Californians Linking Action with Science for Prevention of Breast Cancer (CLASP-BC) is part of California Breast Cancer Research Program's (CBCRP) Initiative strategic priority to disseminate and implement high-impact, population-based primary prevention interventions. CLASP-BC is informed by six years of funded program dissemination and implementation (D&I) research and evaluation conducted by the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (CPAC) throu…
An Expanded Agenda for the Primary Prevention of Breast Cancer
Advances in breast cancer science, early detection, and treatment have resulted in improvements in breast cancer survival but not in breast cancer incidence. After skin cancer, breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosis in the United States. Each year, nearly a quarter million U.S. women receive a breast cancer diagnosis, and the number continues to rise each year with the growth in the population of older women. Although much remains to b…
Doing What We Know, Knowing What to Do
Given the lack of progress in breast cancer prevention, the California Breast Cancer Research Program (CBCRP) plans to apply current scientific knowledge about breast cancer to primary prevention at the population level. This paper describes the first phase of Californians Linking Action with Science for Prevention of Breast Cancer (CLASP-BC). The foci of Phase 1 are building coalitions and coalition capacity building through community engagement…
Development and Evaluation of a Training Program for Community-Based Participatory Research in Breast Cancer
This paper describes the development and feasibility of the Community Based Research Infrastructure to Better Science (CRIBS) training. The goal of this training program was to help new or existing community-academic teams to build strong partnerships and successfully develop together fundable research projects focused on breast cancer environmental causes and disparities. A comprehensive mixed-methods participatory approach was utilized to asses…
Assessing Process and Outcomes
Assessing Process and Outcomes: Evaluating Community-Based Participatory Research Marj Plumb, DrPH Mna (bio), Natalie Collins, MSW (bio), Janna N. Cordeiro, MPH (bio), and Mhel Kavanaugh-Lynch, MD MPH (bio) What Is the Purpose of this Study? • To determine the relationship, if any, between the collaborative process of conducting the community research collaboration projects and the reported outcomes. What Is the Problem? • Although the applicatio…
Assessing Process and Outcomes
Although the relationship between process and outcomes is not necessarily causal, these results suggest an association worthy of further investigation
Results of screening adopted Korean children for HBsAg
Results of screening adopted Korean children for HBsAg. D L Murray, M Lynch, A Doughty, and B K ChoCopyRight https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.78.7.855-a Published Online: October 07, 2011
Assessing Process and Outcomes
Although the relationship between process and outcomes is not necessarily causal, these results suggest an association worthy of further investigation
Assessing Process and Outcomes
Assessing Process and Outcomes: Evaluating Community-Based Participatory Research Marj Plumb, DrPH Mna (bio), Natalie Collins, MSW (bio), Janna N. Cordeiro, MPH (bio), and Mhel Kavanaugh-Lynch, MD MPH (bio) What Is the Purpose of this Study? • To determine the relationship, if any, between the collaborative process of conducting the community research collaboration projects and the reported outcomes. What Is the Problem? • Although the applicatio…
Results of screening adopted Korean children for HBsAg
Results of screening adopted Korean children for HBsAg. D L Murray, M Lynch, A Doughty, and B K ChoCopyRight https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.78.7.855-a Published Online: October 07, 2011
Assessing Process and Outcomes
Assessing Process and Outcomes: Evaluating Community-Based Participatory Research Marj Plumb, DrPH Mna (bio), Natalie Collins, MSW (bio), Janna N. Cordeiro, MPH (bio), and Mhel Kavanaugh-Lynch, MD MPH (bio) What Is the Purpose of this Study? • To determine the relationship, if any, between the collaborative process of conducting the community research collaboration projects and the reported outcomes. What Is the Problem? • Although the applicatio…
Assessing Process and Outcomes
Although the relationship between process and outcomes is not necessarily causal, these results suggest an association worthy of further investigation
Development and Evaluation of a Training Program for Community-Based Participatory Research in Breast Cancer
This paper describes the development and feasibility of the Community Based Research Infrastructure to Better Science (CRIBS) training. The goal of this training program was to help new or existing community-academic teams to build strong partnerships and successfully develop together fundable research projects focused on breast cancer environmental causes and disparities. A comprehensive mixed-methods participatory approach was utilized to asses…
Californians Linking Action with Science for Prevention of Breast Cancer (CLASP-BC)—Phase 2
Californians Linking Action with Science for Prevention of Breast Cancer (CLASP-BC) is part of California Breast Cancer Research Program's (CBCRP) Initiative strategic priority to disseminate and implement high-impact, population-based primary prevention interventions. CLASP-BC is informed by six years of funded program dissemination and implementation (D&I) research and evaluation conducted by the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (CPAC) throu…
An Expanded Agenda for the Primary Prevention of Breast Cancer
Advances in breast cancer science, early detection, and treatment have resulted in improvements in breast cancer survival but not in breast cancer incidence. After skin cancer, breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosis in the United States. Each year, nearly a quarter million U.S. women receive a breast cancer diagnosis, and the number continues to rise each year with the growth in the population of older women. Although much remains to b…
Doing What We Know, Knowing What to Do
Given the lack of progress in breast cancer prevention, the California Breast Cancer Research Program (CBCRP) plans to apply current scientific knowledge about breast cancer to primary prevention at the population level. This paper describes the first phase of Californians Linking Action with Science for Prevention of Breast Cancer (CLASP-BC). The foci of Phase 1 are building coalitions and coalition capacity building through community engagement…
Searching beyond the Lamppost to Reduce Breast Cancer Disparities
Racial and ethnic differences in breast cancer occur by race/ethnicity in both incidence and mortality rates. Women of lower socioeconomic status likewise have poorer outcomes. When race alone is considered, incidence rates in the United States are highest among White women (130.8 per 100,000), with Black women close behind (126.7 per 100,000). Incidence is lowest among Asian/Pacific Islander women, at 93.2 per 100,000. Mortality differences are …
Medicine (8 works) · Health Policy Implementation Science (5 works) · Political science (5 works) · Sociology (5 works) · Breast cancer (4 works) · Cancer (4 works) · Community-based participatory research (4 works) · Participatory action research (4 works) · Cancer prevention (3 works) · Community Health and Development (3 works)