Susan M Fritz

Biographic Data

ID10444170
NAMESusan M Fritz
GIVEN NAMESSusan M
FAMILY NAMEFritz
SIGNATUREFRITZ S M
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS6
TOTAL CITATIONS6
WORKS AS AUTHOR6
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2000
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2007
H-INDEX1

  • Effects of Gender, Education, and Age upon Leaders’ Use of Influence Tactics and Full Range Leadership Behaviors

    Open AccessJohn E Barbuto, Susan Fritz et al.ARTICLESex Roles2007Cited by: 6References: 8

  • Sex Differences among Five Sources of Motivation in the Motivation Sources Inventory

    Open AccessJohn E Barbuto, Susan Fritz et al.ARTICLEPsychological Reports2003

    Paper reports sex differences among five sources of motivation for a sample of 208 undergraduate students who completed the Motivation Sources Inventory. t tests yielded few statistically significant sex differences for the five sources of motivation; however, Instrumental Motivation was higher among men than women, while the remaining four motives showed no sex difference. Implications and research opportunities are discussed

  • Correlations for Leaders' Anticipation of Targets' Resistance and Targets' Ratings of Leaders' Influence Tactics

    Open AccessJohn E Barbuto, Brent J Coertzen et al.ARTICLEPsychological Reports2002

    A sample of 553 leader-target dyads was used to replicate the 2001 work of Barbuto, Scholl, Hickox, and Boulmetis. The study examined the correlation between leaders' anticipation of targets' resistance and influence tactics used by leaders to persuade targets. The original study reported mixed findings of various hard and soft tactics used by leaders based on the different zones of resistance anticipated. Present results show no relation between…

  • Leaders' Anticipated and Targets' Self-Reported Resistance to Task Assignments

    Open AccessJohn E Barbuto, Susan Fritz et al.ARTICLEPsychological Reports2002

    This is a follow up study of Barbuto's 2000 work in which leaders' ratings and targets' self-reported resistance to task assignments are compared. Scores on the Anticipated Resistance Indicator among 650 leader-member dyads measure resistance based on Barbuto's 1997 five concentric zones of Preference, Indifference, Legitimate, Influence, and Noninfluence, examined from both leaders' and targets' perspectives. Responses indicated that leaders ten…

  • Leaders' Bases of Social Power and Anticipation of Targets' Resistance as Predictors of Transactional and Transformational Leadership

    Open AccessJohn E Barbuto, Susan Fritz et al.ARTICLEPsychological Reports2001

    This paper examines the value of power and resistance for predicting transactional and transformational leadership. A sample of 232 leader-follower dyads was used to examine these relationships using Hinkin and Schriesheim's 1989 measure of power, Barbuto's 2000 measure of resistance, and Bass' 1985 measure of transformational leadership. Analysis yielded a significant negative relationship between leaders' Reward Power and their use of Individua…

  • A Field Study of Two Measures of Work Motivation for Predicting Leader's Transformational Behaviors

    Open AccessJohn E Barbuto, Susan Fritz et al.ARTICLEPsychological Reports2000

    Relationships between motivation and transformational leadership were examined in this study. 56 leaders and 234 followers from a variety of organizations were sampled. Leaders were administered the Motivation Sources Inventory and the Job Choice Decision-making Exercise, while followers reported leaders' behaviors using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ-rater version). Scores on the Motivation Sources Inventory subscales subsequently…