Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

James A Schmiechen

Biographic Data

ID1050709
NAMEJames A Schmiechen
GIVEN NAMESJames A
FAMILY NAMESchmiechen
SIGNATURESCHMIECHEN J A
AFFILIATIONSCentral Michigan University
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS7
TOTAL CITATIONS3
AUTHOR COUNT7
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1975
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR1986
H-INDEX1
  • Sweated Industries and Sweated Labor: The London Clothing Trades, 1860-1914

    Adrian J Randall, Adrian Randall et al.•ARTICLE•Technology and Culture•1986

  • Sweated Industries and Sweated Labor: The London Clothing Trades, 1860-1914

    Gerald Tulchinsky, James A Schmiechen•ARTICLE•Labour / Le Travail•1986

  • Urban Workers in the Early Industrial Revolution

    James A Schmiechen, Robert Glen et al.•ARTICLE•Technology and Culture•1986

  • Sweated Industries and Sweated Labour: The London Clothing Trades, 1860-1914

    Duncan Bythell, James A Schmiechen•ARTICLE•The Economic History Review•1985

  • State Reform and the Local Economy: A Reply

    Open Access•James A Schmiechen•ARTICLE•The Economic History Review•1982

    In my original article I argued that an overall unevenness in factory and workshop regulation-especially a lack of regulation of non-factory work-made it advantageous for employers in the clothing trades to send work to less regulated premises, and hence production actually decentralized in that industry. 1 Morris disputes this. She argues that regulation was much more uniform than I suggest and that instead of moving away from the factory, produ…

  • State Reform and the Local Economy: A Reply

    James A Schmiechen•ARTICLE•The Economic History Review•1982

  • State Reform and the Local Economy: An Aspect of Industrialization in Late Victorian and Edwardian London

    Open Access•James A Schmiechen, James A Sghmiechen•ARTICLE•The Economic History Review•1975•Cited by: 3

    I T is commonly accepted that the long-term character of nineteenth-century industrialization was centripetal in nature; that is, the dominant tendency was to centralize production and labour within the factory. The factory has been seen not only as one of the most effective agencies in unifying the working people of the nation but also as representing the natural progression to greater and more sophisticated economic organization. Any deviation …

  • State Reform and the Local Economy: An Aspect of Industrialization in Late Victorian and Edwardian London

    Open Access•James A Schmiechen, James A Sghmiechen•ARTICLE•The Economic History Review•1975•Cited by: 3

    I T is commonly accepted that the long-term character of nineteenth-century industrialization was centripetal in nature; that is, the dominant tendency was to centralize production and labour within the factory. The factory has been seen not only as one of the most effective agencies in unifying the working people of the nation but also as representing the natural progression to greater and more sophisticated economic organization. Any deviation …

  • State Reform and the Local Economy: An Aspect of Industrialization in Late Victorian and Edwardian London

    Open Access•James A Schmiechen, James A Sghmiechen•ARTICLE•The Economic History Review•1975•Cited by: 3

    I T is commonly accepted that the long-term character of nineteenth-century industrialization was centripetal in nature; that is, the dominant tendency was to centralize production and labour within the factory. The factory has been seen not only as one of the most effective agencies in unifying the working people of the nation but also as representing the natural progression to greater and more sophisticated economic organization. Any deviation …

  • State Reform and the Local Economy: A Reply

    Open Access•James A Schmiechen•ARTICLE•The Economic History Review•1982

    In my original article I argued that an overall unevenness in factory and workshop regulation-especially a lack of regulation of non-factory work-made it advantageous for employers in the clothing trades to send work to less regulated premises, and hence production actually decentralized in that industry. 1 Morris disputes this. She argues that regulation was much more uniform than I suggest and that instead of moving away from the factory, produ…

  • State Reform and the Local Economy: A Reply

    James A Schmiechen•ARTICLE•The Economic History Review•1982

  • Sweated Industries and Sweated Labour: The London Clothing Trades, 1860-1914

    Duncan Bythell, James A Schmiechen•ARTICLE•The Economic History Review•1985

  • Sweated Industries and Sweated Labor: The London Clothing Trades, 1860-1914

    Adrian J Randall, Adrian Randall et al.•ARTICLE•Technology and Culture•1986

  • Sweated Industries and Sweated Labor: The London Clothing Trades, 1860-1914

    Gerald Tulchinsky, James A Schmiechen•ARTICLE•Labour / Le Travail•1986

  • Urban Workers in the Early Industrial Revolution

    James A Schmiechen, Robert Glen et al.•ARTICLE•Technology and Culture•1986

Political science (6 works) · Economics (4 works) · Clothing (3 works) · Fashion and Cultural Textiles (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Business (2 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Economic system (2 works) · State (computer science (2 works) · Archaeology (1 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae