H Ron Davidson
Biographic Data
| ID | 10552167 |
|---|---|
| NAME | H Ron Davidson |
| GIVEN NAMES | H Ron |
| FAMILY NAME | Davidson |
| SIGNATURE | DAVIDSON H R |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 2 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 2 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2004 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2018 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
The Law of Voting and the Voting For Law
This article seeks to accomplish three goals. First, it seeks to explain apparent paradoxes in the jurisprudence of the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg by applying principles from the academic discipline called Public Choice. Secondly, it seeks to show that the Public Choice phenomenon called the Doctrinal Paradox is more than just a possibility in international courts. It, in fact, emerged repeatedly at the International Military Tr…
The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda's Decision in The Prosecutor v. Ferdinand Nahimana et al
In The Prosecutor v. Nahimana et al. , the trial chamber of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda sought to define the offence of ‘direct and public incitement to commit genocide’. This case note discusses the elements required in the opinion before turning to the way in which the trial chamber applied its tests. Case law from the European Court of Human Rights and laws from a range of national jurisdictions are used to contrast the appr…
The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda's Decision in The Prosecutor v. Ferdinand Nahimana et al
In The Prosecutor v. Nahimana et al. , the trial chamber of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda sought to define the offence of ‘direct and public incitement to commit genocide’. This case note discusses the elements required in the opinion before turning to the way in which the trial chamber applied its tests. Case law from the European Court of Human Rights and laws from a range of national jurisdictions are used to contrast the appr…
The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda's Decision in The Prosecutor v. Ferdinand Nahimana et al
In The Prosecutor v. Nahimana et al. , the trial chamber of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda sought to define the offence of ‘direct and public incitement to commit genocide’. This case note discusses the elements required in the opinion before turning to the way in which the trial chamber applied its tests. Case law from the European Court of Human Rights and laws from a range of national jurisdictions are used to contrast the appr…
The Law of Voting and the Voting For Law
This article seeks to accomplish three goals. First, it seeks to explain apparent paradoxes in the jurisprudence of the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg by applying principles from the academic discipline called Public Choice. Secondly, it seeks to show that the Public Choice phenomenon called the Doctrinal Paradox is more than just a possibility in international courts. It, in fact, emerged repeatedly at the International Military Tr…
International law (2 works) · International Law and Human Rights (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Tribunal (2 works) · Commit (1 work) · Criminal law (1 work) · Epistemology (1 work) · Genocide (1 work) · Human rights (1 work)