Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Patrick Rysiew

Biographic Data

ID1067942
NAMEPatrick Rysiew
GIVEN NAMESPatrick
FAMILY NAMERysiew
SIGNATURERYSIEW P
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Victoria
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS10
TOTAL CITATIONS44
WORKS AS AUTHOR10
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2002
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2021
H-INDEX4
  • Common Sense in Reid’s Response to Scepticism

    Patrick Rysiew•ARTICLE•Revue philosophique de la France…•2021

    Le sens commun est au cœur des conceptions épistémologiques de Thomas Reid. Pourtant, tout comme sa théorie positive, la réponse de Reid au scepticisme – ce qu’elle est censée établir et la manière dont elle le fait – est sujette à débat. Certes, dans la mesure où elle respecte et défend notre conception ordinaire de nous-mêmes comme détenteurs de connaissances provenant d’une variété de sources, toute réponse au scepticisme relève bien du « bon …

  • Meaning, Communication, and the Mental

    Patrick Rysiew, ProtoSociology Project•ARTICLE•ProtoSociology•2017

  • Judgment and Practice in Reid and Wittgenstein

    Open Access•Patrick Rysiew•ARTICLE•European Journal of Pragmatism…•2017•References: 16

    This paper considers the views of two figures whose work falls on either side of the heyday of American pragmatism, Thomas Reid (1710-96) and Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889-1951). The broad similarities between Reid’s and (the later) Wittgenstein’s views, and in particular their epistemological views, has been well documented. Here, I argue that such similarities extend to the relation in their work between common sense and the presence of elements in…

  • Clarity about concessive knowledge attributions

    Open Access•Trent Dougherty, Patrick Rysiew•ARTICLE•Synthese•2011•Cited by: 6•References: 9

  • Fallibilism, Epistemic Possibility, and Concessive Knowledge Attributions

    Open Access•Trent Dougherty, Patrick Rysiew•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2008•Cited by: 19

  • Rationality Disputes - Psychology and Epistemology

    Open Access•Patrick Rysiew•ARTICLE•Philosophy Compass•2008•Cited by: 1•References: 64

    This paper reviews the largely psychological literature surrounding apparent failures of human rationality (sometimes referred to as 'the Rationality Wars') and locates it with respect to concepts and issues within more traditional epistemological inquiry. The goal is to bridge the gap between these two large and typically disconnected literatures - concerning rationality and the psychology of human reasoning, on the one hand, and epistemological…

  • A study in the cognition of individuals’ identity

    Open Access•Nicolas J Bullot, Patrick Rysiew•ARTICLE•Consciousness and Cognition•2007

  • Reidian Evidence

    Open Access•Patrick Rysiew•ARTICLE•Journal of Scottish Philosophy•2005•Cited by: 4•References: 2

  • Encouragement in Darwin

    Patrick Rysiew, Peter Lang•ARTICLE•Facta Philosophica•2002

  • Reid and Epistemic Naturalism

    Patrick Rysiew•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•2002•Cited by: 14•References: 15

    Central to the contemporary dispute over 'naturalizing epistemology' is the question of the continuity of epistemology with science, i.e., how far purely descriptive, psychological matters can or should inform the traditional evaluative epistemological enterprise. Thus all parties tend to agree that the distinction between psychology and epistemology corresponds to a firm fact/value distinction. This is something Reid denies with respect to the f…

  • Fallibilism, Epistemic Possibility, and Concessive Knowledge Attributions

    Open Access•Trent Dougherty, Patrick Rysiew•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2008•Cited by: 19

  • Reid and Epistemic Naturalism

    Patrick Rysiew•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•2002•Cited by: 14•References: 15

    Central to the contemporary dispute over 'naturalizing epistemology' is the question of the continuity of epistemology with science, i.e., how far purely descriptive, psychological matters can or should inform the traditional evaluative epistemological enterprise. Thus all parties tend to agree that the distinction between psychology and epistemology corresponds to a firm fact/value distinction. This is something Reid denies with respect to the f…

  • Clarity about concessive knowledge attributions

    Open Access•Trent Dougherty, Patrick Rysiew•ARTICLE•Synthese•2011•Cited by: 6•References: 9

  • Reidian Evidence

    Open Access•Patrick Rysiew•ARTICLE•Journal of Scottish Philosophy•2005•Cited by: 4•References: 2

  • Rationality Disputes - Psychology and Epistemology

    Open Access•Patrick Rysiew•ARTICLE•Philosophy Compass•2008•Cited by: 1•References: 64

    This paper reviews the largely psychological literature surrounding apparent failures of human rationality (sometimes referred to as 'the Rationality Wars') and locates it with respect to concepts and issues within more traditional epistemological inquiry. The goal is to bridge the gap between these two large and typically disconnected literatures - concerning rationality and the psychology of human reasoning, on the one hand, and epistemological…

  • Encouragement in Darwin

    Patrick Rysiew, Peter Lang•ARTICLE•Facta Philosophica•2002

  • Reid and Epistemic Naturalism

    Patrick Rysiew•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•2002•Cited by: 14•References: 15

    Central to the contemporary dispute over 'naturalizing epistemology' is the question of the continuity of epistemology with science, i.e., how far purely descriptive, psychological matters can or should inform the traditional evaluative epistemological enterprise. Thus all parties tend to agree that the distinction between psychology and epistemology corresponds to a firm fact/value distinction. This is something Reid denies with respect to the f…

  • Reidian Evidence

    Open Access•Patrick Rysiew•ARTICLE•Journal of Scottish Philosophy•2005•Cited by: 4•References: 2

  • A study in the cognition of individuals’ identity

    Open Access•Nicolas J Bullot, Patrick Rysiew•ARTICLE•Consciousness and Cognition•2007

  • Fallibilism, Epistemic Possibility, and Concessive Knowledge Attributions

    Open Access•Trent Dougherty, Patrick Rysiew•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2008•Cited by: 19

  • Rationality Disputes - Psychology and Epistemology

    Open Access•Patrick Rysiew•ARTICLE•Philosophy Compass•2008•Cited by: 1•References: 64

    This paper reviews the largely psychological literature surrounding apparent failures of human rationality (sometimes referred to as 'the Rationality Wars') and locates it with respect to concepts and issues within more traditional epistemological inquiry. The goal is to bridge the gap between these two large and typically disconnected literatures - concerning rationality and the psychology of human reasoning, on the one hand, and epistemological…

  • Clarity about concessive knowledge attributions

    Open Access•Trent Dougherty, Patrick Rysiew•ARTICLE•Synthese•2011•Cited by: 6•References: 9

  • Meaning, Communication, and the Mental

    Patrick Rysiew, ProtoSociology Project•ARTICLE•ProtoSociology•2017

  • Judgment and Practice in Reid and Wittgenstein

    Open Access•Patrick Rysiew•ARTICLE•European Journal of Pragmatism…•2017•References: 16

    This paper considers the views of two figures whose work falls on either side of the heyday of American pragmatism, Thomas Reid (1710-96) and Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889-1951). The broad similarities between Reid’s and (the later) Wittgenstein’s views, and in particular their epistemological views, has been well documented. Here, I argue that such similarities extend to the relation in their work between common sense and the presence of elements in…

  • Common Sense in Reid’s Response to Scepticism

    Patrick Rysiew•ARTICLE•Revue philosophique de la France…•2021

    Le sens commun est au cœur des conceptions épistémologiques de Thomas Reid. Pourtant, tout comme sa théorie positive, la réponse de Reid au scepticisme – ce qu’elle est censée établir et la manière dont elle le fait – est sujette à débat. Certes, dans la mesure où elle respecte et défend notre conception ordinaire de nous-mêmes comme détenteurs de connaissances provenant d’une variété de sources, toute réponse au scepticisme relève bien du « bon …

Philosophy (9 works) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (7 works) · Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 works) · Epistemology (5 works) · Psychology (5 works) · Computer Science (4 works) · Philosophy (4 works) · Mathematics (3 works) · Social Psychology (3 works) · Sociology (3 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae