Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Nicholas Jolley

Biographic Data

ID1069309
NAMENicholas Jolley
GIVEN NAMESNicholas
FAMILY NAMEJolley
SIGNATUREJOLLEY N
AFFILIATIONSConcordia University Irvine
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS22
TOTAL CITATIONS8
AUTHOR COUNT22
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1975
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2019
H-INDEX1
  • Leibniz

    Nicholas Jolley•BOOK•Leibniz•2019

  • Causality and Mind

    Nicholas Jolley•BOOK•Causality and Mind•2013

  • Malebranche on the Soul

    Nicholas Jolley•CHAPTER•Causality and Mind•2013

    In the seventeenth century few philosophers, if any, made more interesting and important contributions to the philosophy of mind than Malebranche. This chapter argues that, armed with the theological slogan that the mind is not a light to itself, Malebranche pioneers anti-Cartesian theories about the nature of the intellect and sensations; in particular, he challenges the view that intentionality is a mark of the mental. The chapter further argue…

  • The Leibniz-De Volder Correspondence

    Open Access•Nicholas Jolley•ARTICLE•Renaissance Quarterly•2013

    Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. The Leibniz-De Volder Correspondence: With Selections from the Correspondence between Leibniz and Johann Bernoulli. Ed. and trans. Paul Lodge. The Yale Leibniz. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012. ci + 416 pp. $85. ISBN: 978–0–300–10823–1. - Volume 66 Issue 3

  • Leibniz et l'autosuffisance causale des substances

    Nicholas Jolley•ARTICLE•Revue Philosophique de Louvain•2009

    Jolley Nicholas, Saliceti Marion. Leibniz et l'autosuffisance causale des substances. In: Revue Philosophique de Louvain. Troisième série, tome 107, n°4, 2009. pp. 699-716

  • The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Philosophy

    Open Access•Stephen Gaukroger, Dennis Des Chene et al.•BOOK•The Cambridge companion to early…•2006

    The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Philosophy is a comprehensive introduction to the central topics and changing shape of philosophical inquiry in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. It explores one of the most innovative periods in the history of Western philosophy, extending from Montaigne, Bacon and Descartes through Hume and Kant. During this period, philosophers initiated and responded to major intellectual developments in natural…

  • Descartes's Concept of Mind; Descartes's Theory of Mind

    Nicholas Jolley•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•2005

  • Leibniz

    Nicholas Jolley•BOOK•Leibniz•2005

  • Occasionalism and Efficacious Laws in Malebranche

    Open Access•Nicholas Jolley•ARTICLE•Midwest Studies in Philosophy•2002

  • New Essays on the Rationalists

    Nicholas Jolley, Rocco J Gennaro et al.•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•2001

  • New Essays on the Rationalists

    Nicholas Jolley•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•2001

    Book Review| October 01 2001 NEW ESSAYS ON THE RATIONALISTS NEW ESSAYS ON THE RATIONALISTS. Rocco J. Gennaro and Charles Huenemann, Eds. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. xviii, 391. Nicholas Jolley Nicholas Jolley Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google The Philosophical Review (2001) 110 (4): 600–603. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-110-4-600 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Cit…

  • The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz

    Robert Merrihew Adams, Nicholas Jolley•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1996

  • Intellect and Illumination in Malebranche

    Nicholas Jolley•ARTICLE•Journal of the history of…•1994•Cited by: 1

    Le but de cet article est de montrer que Malebranche, dans ses oeuvres matures, rejette la notion cartesienne d'intellect pur au profit d'une theorie de l'illumination (inspiree par saint Augustin), i.e. idees causales provenant de Dieu. L'A. etudie les problemes souleves par cette theorie, et l'evolution de la pensee rationaliste et religieuse de Malebranche

  • On True and False Ideas

    Nicholas Jolley, Antoine Arnauld et al.•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1992

    This is an English translation of Arnauld's philosophical reply to Malebranche's Search After Truth. It forms the core of one of the most important philosophical controversies of the 17th century, and one which was to have an impact on 18th-century philosophy, especially in Britain. The translation is accompanied by an introductory essay which looks at the history of the problem of perceptual cognition up until the dispute between Arnauld and Mal…

  • Meditations on first philosophy with selections from the objections and replies

    Nicholas Jolley•REVIEW•History of European Ideas•1988

  • Leibniz and Malebranche on Innate Ideas

    Nicholas Jolley•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1988•Cited by: 1

    2 veryone knows that Locke attacked, and Leibniz defended, the doctrine of innate ideas. But it is much less well known that innate ideas were attacked by one seventeenth-century philosopher who is conventionally classified as a rationalist: in The Search After Truth, Malebranche explicitly rejects the doctrine which his predecessor, Descartes, had revived.' In view of his philosophical allegiances, Malebranche's stand is somewhat surprising. As …

  • Leibniz and Locke

    Jonathan Bennett, Nicholas Jolley•ARTICLE•Noûs•1986

  • Thinking Matter

    Nicholas Jolley, John W Yolton et al.•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1986

  • Leibniz and Locke

    Peter Remnant, Nicholas Jolley•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1986

    This is the first modern interpretation of Leibniz's comprehensive critique of Locke, the New Essays on Human Understanding. Arguing that the New Essays is controlled by the overriding purpose of refuting Locke's alleged materialism, Jolley establishes the metaphysical and theological motivation of the work on the basis of unpublished correspondence and manuscript material. He also shows the relevance of Leibniz's views to contemporary debates ov…

  • Locke's Pyrrhic Victory

    Henry E Allison, Nicholas Jolley•ARTICLE•Journal of the History of Ideas•1981

  • Leibniz on Locke and Socinianism

    Nicholas Jolley•ARTICLE•Journal of the History of Ideas•1978

  • Leibniz on Hobbes, Locke's Two Treatises and Sherlock's Case of Allegiance

    Open Access•Nicholas Jolley•ARTICLE•The Historical Journal•1975•Cited by: 6•References: 3

    Writers on Leibniz have frequently stressed the marked contrast in character between his metaphysics and his political theory. As a metaphysician Leibniz appears as a thinker of daring originality whose views have sometimes seemed to set up certain tensions with orthodox Christian teaching. In the field of political theory, however, we encounter a much more traditional and conservative figure. Writing in a post-Hobbesian period Leibniz is a deter…

  • Leibniz on Hobbes, Locke's Two Treatises and Sherlock's Case of Allegiance

    Open Access•Nicholas Jolley•ARTICLE•The Historical Journal•1975•Cited by: 6•References: 3

    Writers on Leibniz have frequently stressed the marked contrast in character between his metaphysics and his political theory. As a metaphysician Leibniz appears as a thinker of daring originality whose views have sometimes seemed to set up certain tensions with orthodox Christian teaching. In the field of political theory, however, we encounter a much more traditional and conservative figure. Writing in a post-Hobbesian period Leibniz is a deter…

  • Intellect and Illumination in Malebranche

    Nicholas Jolley•ARTICLE•Journal of the history of…•1994•Cited by: 1

    Le but de cet article est de montrer que Malebranche, dans ses oeuvres matures, rejette la notion cartesienne d'intellect pur au profit d'une theorie de l'illumination (inspiree par saint Augustin), i.e. idees causales provenant de Dieu. L'A. etudie les problemes souleves par cette theorie, et l'evolution de la pensee rationaliste et religieuse de Malebranche

  • Leibniz and Malebranche on Innate Ideas

    Nicholas Jolley•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1988•Cited by: 1

    2 veryone knows that Locke attacked, and Leibniz defended, the doctrine of innate ideas. But it is much less well known that innate ideas were attacked by one seventeenth-century philosopher who is conventionally classified as a rationalist: in The Search After Truth, Malebranche explicitly rejects the doctrine which his predecessor, Descartes, had revived.' In view of his philosophical allegiances, Malebranche's stand is somewhat surprising. As …

  • Leibniz on Hobbes, Locke's Two Treatises and Sherlock's Case of Allegiance

    Open Access•Nicholas Jolley•ARTICLE•The Historical Journal•1975•Cited by: 6•References: 3

    Writers on Leibniz have frequently stressed the marked contrast in character between his metaphysics and his political theory. As a metaphysician Leibniz appears as a thinker of daring originality whose views have sometimes seemed to set up certain tensions with orthodox Christian teaching. In the field of political theory, however, we encounter a much more traditional and conservative figure. Writing in a post-Hobbesian period Leibniz is a deter…

  • Leibniz on Locke and Socinianism

    Nicholas Jolley•ARTICLE•Journal of the History of Ideas•1978

  • Locke's Pyrrhic Victory

    Henry E Allison, Nicholas Jolley•ARTICLE•Journal of the History of Ideas•1981

  • Leibniz and Locke

    Jonathan Bennett, Nicholas Jolley•ARTICLE•Noûs•1986

  • Thinking Matter

    Nicholas Jolley, John W Yolton et al.•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1986

  • Leibniz and Locke

    Peter Remnant, Nicholas Jolley•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1986

    This is the first modern interpretation of Leibniz's comprehensive critique of Locke, the New Essays on Human Understanding. Arguing that the New Essays is controlled by the overriding purpose of refuting Locke's alleged materialism, Jolley establishes the metaphysical and theological motivation of the work on the basis of unpublished correspondence and manuscript material. He also shows the relevance of Leibniz's views to contemporary debates ov…

  • Meditations on first philosophy with selections from the objections and replies

    Nicholas Jolley•REVIEW•History of European Ideas•1988

  • Leibniz and Malebranche on Innate Ideas

    Nicholas Jolley•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1988•Cited by: 1

    2 veryone knows that Locke attacked, and Leibniz defended, the doctrine of innate ideas. But it is much less well known that innate ideas were attacked by one seventeenth-century philosopher who is conventionally classified as a rationalist: in The Search After Truth, Malebranche explicitly rejects the doctrine which his predecessor, Descartes, had revived.' In view of his philosophical allegiances, Malebranche's stand is somewhat surprising. As …

  • On True and False Ideas

    Nicholas Jolley, Antoine Arnauld et al.•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1992

    This is an English translation of Arnauld's philosophical reply to Malebranche's Search After Truth. It forms the core of one of the most important philosophical controversies of the 17th century, and one which was to have an impact on 18th-century philosophy, especially in Britain. The translation is accompanied by an introductory essay which looks at the history of the problem of perceptual cognition up until the dispute between Arnauld and Mal…

  • Intellect and Illumination in Malebranche

    Nicholas Jolley•ARTICLE•Journal of the history of…•1994•Cited by: 1

    Le but de cet article est de montrer que Malebranche, dans ses oeuvres matures, rejette la notion cartesienne d'intellect pur au profit d'une theorie de l'illumination (inspiree par saint Augustin), i.e. idees causales provenant de Dieu. L'A. etudie les problemes souleves par cette theorie, et l'evolution de la pensee rationaliste et religieuse de Malebranche

  • The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz

    Robert Merrihew Adams, Nicholas Jolley•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1996

  • New Essays on the Rationalists

    Nicholas Jolley, Rocco J Gennaro et al.•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•2001

  • New Essays on the Rationalists

    Nicholas Jolley•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•2001

    Book Review| October 01 2001 NEW ESSAYS ON THE RATIONALISTS NEW ESSAYS ON THE RATIONALISTS. Rocco J. Gennaro and Charles Huenemann, Eds. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. xviii, 391. Nicholas Jolley Nicholas Jolley Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google The Philosophical Review (2001) 110 (4): 600–603. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-110-4-600 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Cit…

  • Occasionalism and Efficacious Laws in Malebranche

    Open Access•Nicholas Jolley•ARTICLE•Midwest Studies in Philosophy•2002

  • Descartes's Concept of Mind; Descartes's Theory of Mind

    Nicholas Jolley•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•2005

  • Leibniz

    Nicholas Jolley•BOOK•Leibniz•2005

  • The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Philosophy

    Open Access•Stephen Gaukroger, Dennis Des Chene et al.•BOOK•The Cambridge companion to early…•2006

    The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Philosophy is a comprehensive introduction to the central topics and changing shape of philosophical inquiry in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. It explores one of the most innovative periods in the history of Western philosophy, extending from Montaigne, Bacon and Descartes through Hume and Kant. During this period, philosophers initiated and responded to major intellectual developments in natural…

  • Leibniz et l'autosuffisance causale des substances

    Nicholas Jolley•ARTICLE•Revue Philosophique de Louvain•2009

    Jolley Nicholas, Saliceti Marion. Leibniz et l'autosuffisance causale des substances. In: Revue Philosophique de Louvain. Troisième série, tome 107, n°4, 2009. pp. 699-716

  • Causality and Mind

    Nicholas Jolley•BOOK•Causality and Mind•2013

  • Malebranche on the Soul

    Nicholas Jolley•CHAPTER•Causality and Mind•2013

    In the seventeenth century few philosophers, if any, made more interesting and important contributions to the philosophy of mind than Malebranche. This chapter argues that, armed with the theological slogan that the mind is not a light to itself, Malebranche pioneers anti-Cartesian theories about the nature of the intellect and sensations; in particular, he challenges the view that intentionality is a mark of the mental. The chapter further argue…

  • The Leibniz-De Volder Correspondence

    Open Access•Nicholas Jolley•ARTICLE•Renaissance Quarterly•2013

    Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. The Leibniz-De Volder Correspondence: With Selections from the Correspondence between Leibniz and Johann Bernoulli. Ed. and trans. Paul Lodge. The Yale Leibniz. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012. ci + 416 pp. $85. ISBN: 978–0–300–10823–1. - Volume 66 Issue 3

  • Leibniz

    Nicholas Jolley•BOOK•Leibniz•2019

Philosophy (18 works) · Epistemology (15 works) · Historical Philosophy and Science (13 works) · Classical Philosophy and Thought (8 works) · Contemporary philosophy (7 works) · Analytic philosophy (6 works) · General interest (5 works) · Law (4 works) · modern (4 works) · Philosophy (4 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae